SCOTUS Denies NC Request To Halt Ruling Blocking Voting Restrictions

FILE - In this Sept. 9, 2010 file phoro, a lone voter takes part in early voting in Milwaukee. The Supreme Court deals with churning election rules in several states less than a month from November's voting, blockin... FILE - In this Sept. 9, 2010 file phoro, a lone voter takes part in early voting in Milwaukee. The Supreme Court deals with churning election rules in several states less than a month from November's voting, blocking voter ID laws in Wisconsin while siding with Republicans for stricter rules in North Carolina and Ohio. In Texas, a federal court strikes down a voter ID law, but the state may still appeal that ruling. (AP Photo/Morry Gash) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

With a tie vote in a closely watched case, the Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed a series of voting restrictions in North Carolina to remain blocked ahead of November’s elections. The court handed down an order denying the request by the state to allow it to implement some of the restrictive provisions — provisions that had been struck down and deemed discriminatory in their intent by a panel of judges on the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last month.

The order means the appeals court ruling will stand at least through November, while signaling that the Supreme Court is likely split on the larger issue of the legality of the restrictions.

Wednesday’s order stems from a legal challenge brought against the state by voting rights group as well as the Department of Justices for provisions in the omnibus voting legislation passed by GOP North Carolina lawmakers in 2013. The appeals court found in an opinion released in late July that five provisions of the law — a photo IDs requirement, a cutback to early voting, the elimination of same day registration, a ban of out-of-precinct voting and a prohibition on pre-registration of young voters — “disproportionately affected African Americans” and targeted “African Americans with almost surgical precision.”

North Carolina had asked the Supreme Court for an emergency stay on the ruling so it could implement some of the invalidated provisions — specifically its photo ID requirement, the early voting limits and the pre-registration ban — for November’s election. According to Wednesday’s order, the conservative justices were willing to side with the state on at least some of North Carolina’s request. However, the death of Justice Antonin Scalia last February has robbed the conservative bloc its crucial fifth vote necessary to halt the appeals court decision.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Hey, Senate Republicans, how’s that refusal to confirm Garland workin’ fer ya?

  2. McCrory’s chickens have come home to roost, and they’re crapping all over his precious right-wing agenda.

    Poor Pitiful Pat is going to lose so badly in November.

  3. I am still not used to all the good news from SCOTUS now that u-know-hoo is gone.

  4. Brings two smiles to my face - one for the kick in McCrory’s balls, the other for the great big kick in Scalia’s.

    Make that three - the biggest for democracy.

  5. Zip-a-dee-doo-dah, zip-a-dee-ay
    My, oh my, what a wonderful day
    Plenty of sunshine headin’ my way
    Zip-a-dee-doo-dah, zip-a-dee-ay

    Mister Bluebird’s on my shoulder
    It’s the truth, it’s actual
    Ev’rything is satisfactual
    Zip-a-dee-doo-dah, zip-a-dee-ay
    Wonderful feeling, wonderful day, yes sir!

    Ironically from the movie “Song of the South”

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

44 more replies

Participants

Avatar for george_c Avatar for alliebean Avatar for jootjoint Avatar for ajaykalra Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for shmoople Avatar for mikem42 Avatar for humpback Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for theghostofeustacetilley Avatar for ignoreland Avatar for phlebas Avatar for candirue Avatar for pine Avatar for pshah Avatar for beattycat Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for wbmanx Avatar for jeffreybruner Avatar for cologirl Avatar for maximus

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: