Rand Paul Shushes Female CNBC Anchor During Interview (VIDEO)

|
February 2, 2015 6:15 p.m.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) didn’t like the way a CNBC anchor was interviewing him, so he told her to “calm down,” saying she was mischaracterizing basic facts in her questions.

The exchange came in an interview with CNBC anchor Kelly Evans on Monday. Evans asked Paul about legislation he is co-sponsoring with Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) that would allow companies that have cash overseas to bring it home at a holiday corporate tax rate of 6.5 percent. Here’s the transcript of the exchange:

Paul: Well that is incorrect. Let’s go back again. Your premise and your question is mistaken.

Evans: Alright.

Paul: Most of the research doesn’t indicate that. In fact, there is a prominent study by Robert Shapiro looking at the holiday in 2005, when we lowered the rate to 5 percent, and his conclusion was that it brought $300 billion of new capital home. And then it brought it about $30 billion of new tax revenue. The whole purpose of doing that is to bring the money home. There’s two trillion โ€”

Evans: Right, but it works that first year, senator. But their concern is down the road.

Paul: Hey, let me finish. Hey, hey, Kelly.

Evans: I’m sorry, go ahead.

Paul: Calm down a bit here, Kelly. Let me answer the question. The whole point of this legislation is that money has been accumulating. Much money has actually been inverting and people are reincorporating because the tax code in our country is not encouraging money to come home. So this is to lower tax rate, to bring more money home, and to take that new money, some of the tax revenue, and put it into the highway fund. I think this is a win-win-win. You lower a tax rate, you bring in more revenue and you are actually able to plug a whole we have in our highway trust fund.

Evans: What people want, senator, is for you to make this permanent. Why not just make it 6.5 percent period? The problem is that as it happened in 2005โ€”

Paul: Let me answer the question before you get going.

Evans: Alright.

Later on in the interview, Evans asked Paul about a potential conflict of interest concerning Paul’s ophthalmology group in Kentucky. Paul said Evans was “mischaracterizing and confusing the whole situation.”

“I’m only asking about the part that they raised issue with, which was the board,” Evans said. “They said ‘Look, it is a bunch of his family and friends, basically.'”

Newsletters
Get TPM in your inbox, twice weekly.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Paul continued to criticize Evans throughout the interview. At the end, he said it was “bad TV” and “if we do this again, you need to start out with a little more objectivity going into the interview.”

“I will certainly try my best, senator. We hope you will come back and give us that chance,” Evans said.

Watch the interview below:

Latest Livewire
Comments are now Members-Only

Non-members are still able to read comments, but will no longer be able to participate. To join the conversation, sign up now and get:

30% Off Annual Prime Membership

TPM strives to build as inclusive a community as financially possible. We offer FREE memberships to those experiencing financial hardship and FREE memberships for students.

View all options
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: