Priebus: Intel Community Tells Me NYT Story Is ‘Grossly Overstated’

White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus said Friday that a New York Times story alleging communications between members of the Trump campaign and members of the Russian government, including Russian intelligence officials, was “grossly overstated and inaccurate.”

The New York Times reported Tuesday that several Trump campaign aides and associates had “repeated contacts” with Russians during the presidential campaign. Everyone named in the report denied improper behavior.

Appearing on “Fox and Friends” Friday morning, Priebus also referenced denials from unnamed senior intelligence officials to the Wall Street Journal that former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn had had extensive contact with Russian nationals during the presidential campaign; and comments from House Intelligence Committee chair Devin Nunes (R-CA) to the Journal, that he hadn’t seen evidence to support the Times’ story.

“There may be some bad actors within the intelligence community or some holdovers” who are giving stories to reporters, Priebus said. “Nobody knows.”

“But I will tell you this, and I have talked to top levels of the intelligence community; every department, by the way, not just people that are only folks that we’ve put in place. And they have green lighted me to say that I have talked to the highest levels of intelligence officials, and they have assured me that the New York Times Story about constant contacts is grossly overstated and inaccurate.”

“So I wouldn’t come on your show and say something like that if I didn’t have a green light and approval to say it,” he said. “It’s not true. Unless the highest levels of the intelligence community don’t know what they’re talking about, which I highly doubt.”

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Livewire
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: