NRA Sues Seattle Over New Tax On Firearm Sales

NRA members listen to speakers during the NRA Annual Meeting of Members at the National Rifle Association's 142 Annual Meetings and Exhibits in the George R. Brown Convention Center Saturday, May 4, 2013, in Houston.... NRA members listen to speakers during the NRA Annual Meeting of Members at the National Rifle Association's 142 Annual Meetings and Exhibits in the George R. Brown Convention Center Saturday, May 4, 2013, in Houston. National Rifle Association leaders told members Saturday that the fight against gun control legislation is far from over, with battles yet to come in Congress and next year's midterm elections, but they vowed that none in the organization will ever have to surrender their weapons. (AP Photo/Houston Chronicle, Johnny Hanson) MORE LESS

The National Rifle Association, along with other gun rights groups, on Monday sued the city of Seattle over a new “gun violence tax” on those who sell firearms and ammunition in the city.

The city approved the tax earlier in August, and the ordinance will go into effect in January 2016, according to MyNorthwest.com. Seattle will direct revenue from the tax toward “prevention programs and research intended to reduce the burden of gun violence on Seattle residents and neighborhoods.”

The NRA filed a complaint in King County Superior Court arguing that the tax violates a Washington state law that prohibits local governments from enacting their own firearm regulations, according to CBS News.

“Once again, anti-gun activists in Seattle have chosen to violate the Washington State Constitution and trample upon the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens,” Chris Cox, executive director of the NRA¹s legislative arm, said in a Monday statement. “They tried to enact similar regulations back in 2009 and lost. It’s a shame to see such a waste of public resources on issues the courts have already ruled to be a clear violation of state law.”

Lawrence Keane, the president of the National Shooting Sports Foundation, a gun group that joined the lawsuit with the NRA, described the Seattle tax as “nothing but a ‘poll tax’ on the Second Amendment and an effort to drive Seattle’s firearms retailers out of business.” The Second Amendment Foundation also joined the lawsuit against the city.

Seattle lost a 2009 lawsuit brought by the NRA after the city passed a measure prohibiting firearms in parks.

17
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. he NRA, described the Seattle tax as "nothing but a ‘poll tax’ on the Second Amendment

    Why not a pool tax Seattle?

  2. Could we please just have the NRA go fuck themselves? Seriously. Does this mean that a sales tax on guns is a “poll tax” on the second amendment, too? You want toys that have the possibility of being used to kill, you can pay a little extra to help your community clean up after you and your fellow ammosexuals. I’m so tired of the NRA shrieking that EVERY FUCKING THING that we try to do to seek responsibility by gun owners is actually taking rights away.

  3. So the NRA compares purchasing firearms (optional activity) with voting rights restrictions through this “poll tax” garbage?

  4. The NRA wants people to shoot each other. Consider: that would be the natural outcome of arming everyone wouldn’t it? NRA: “Hey…would it be just GRAND if we were all heavily armed and living in total fear of each other?”

  5. Seattle will direct revenue from the tax toward "prevention programs and research intended to reduce the burden of gun violence on Seattle residents and neighborhoods."
    

    So the NRA supports gun violence? Who knew? [Well, everyone – including the NRA.]

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

11 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for alliebean Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for charliee Avatar for brutus1910 Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for crackerjack Avatar for callmeeric Avatar for frankly_my_dear Avatar for cyberduckie Avatar for bd2999 Avatar for jaybeeraybee Avatar for thomasmatthew Avatar for darrtown Avatar for pshah

Continue Discussion