NY Times Looking Into Story Comey Agreed Was ‘Almost Completely Wrong’

People pass the New York Times building in New York, Wednesday, Oct. 10, 2012. The New York Times Co.'s stock rose on Thursday, Oct. 11, 2012, after an analyst raised his rating and price target on the shares. (AP ... People pass the New York Times building in New York, Wednesday, Oct. 10, 2012. The New York Times Co.'s stock rose on Thursday, Oct. 11, 2012, after an analyst raised his rating and price target on the shares. (AP Photo/Richard Drew) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The New York Times on Thursday said it is “looking into” reporting that fired FBI Director James Comey told the Senate Intelligence Committee is inaccurate.

Sen. James Risch (R-ID) on Thursday cited a February report by the New York Times that members of President Donald Trump’s campaign had “repeated contacts” with Russian intelligence officials before the 2016 election.

“That report by the New York Times was not true. Is that a fair statement?” he asked.

“In the main, it was not true,” Comey replied. “The challenge, and I’m not picking on reporters about writing stories about classified information, is that people talking about it often don’t really know what’s going on and those of us who actually know what’s going on are not talking about it.”

Later in the hearing, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) asked Comey, “Would it be fair to characterize that story as almost entirely wrong?”

“Yes,” Comey replied.

“Did you have at the time that story was published any indication of any contact between Trump people and Russians, intelligence officers, other government officials or close associates of the Russian government?” Cotton pressed.

“That’s one I can’t answer sitting here,” Comey said.

He did not specify how much of the story was inaccurate, or which allegations were untrue.

Latest Livewire
18
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for tsp tsp says:

    This will be used to cast doubt on the accuracy and truthfulness of both Comey’s testimony, AND all reporting on Russia’s coercion into our last election by ALL media. End result, we don’t know what to believe, so let’s ignore everything and assume T rump & Co. is completely innocent.

  2. Avatar for jep07 jep07 says:

    They will enlarge this tiny fragment of a much bigger story, spin it perpetually for the base, which will use it as a last refuge for their abject ignorance…

  3. And what do you bet the Times will come back with “We stand by our reporting!” ?!?

  4. Did Comey’s characterization of Kislyak as being more ambassador than intelligence agent maybe explain this?

  5. Journalism is the first draft of history. First drafts often contain mistakes.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

12 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for george_c Avatar for paulw Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for jep07 Avatar for leftflank Avatar for arrrrrj Avatar for skillern Avatar for slagathor Avatar for tsp Avatar for gusfabriani Avatar for michaelryerson Avatar for jsrtheta Avatar for phillip

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: