House Freedom Caucus Leader: We Would ‘Look Favorably’ On Paul Ryan

UNITED STATES - SEPTEMBER 29: Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, questions Cecile Richards, President of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, during a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing in Rayburn Bui... UNITED STATES - SEPTEMBER 29: Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, questions Cecile Richards, President of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, during a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing in Rayburn Building on whether PPFA should be federally funded, September 29, 2015. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call) (CQ Roll Call via AP Images) MORE LESS

The head of the House Freedom Caucus said on Sunday that though the conservative group has endorsed Daniel Webster (R-FL) to be the next House speaker, it would “look favorably” on Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI).

The endorsement was a blow to House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy who unexpectedly dropped out of the running before Republicans were to vote for a nomination.

The Freedom Caucus includes about 40 of the most conservative House members.

Ryan has repeatedly said he wouldn’t run for the job, but Jim Jordan (R-OH), leader of the Freedom Caucus, called him a “good man” and “great communicator” on Sunday.

“Certainly, if he gets into the race, I think our group would look favorably on him,” Jordan said.

33
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. "Look favorably??" Really?? Gee, that’s pretty tepid…and funny!!

  2. In the lynchings that you and your kind perpetrated on blacks and other minorities through the years, the unfortunate victim was always looked upon “favourably”

    Right up to his demise.

  3. Avatar for dwward dwward says:

    So has Ryan shown any signs of changing his mind over the weekend?

    If I were Ryan I wouldn’t take the job. This is the ultimate no win situation.

    Even if he negotiated a bullet proof care-taker role, what’s going to change by the next election? The Republican party has so gerrymandered the crazy that Eric Cantor couldn’t win a primary. They will likely lose some seats at the margins but they’re not going below 2012 levels (where Democrats had 1,000,000 more votes for congress than Republicans and the GOP majority held firm) which means the next GOP congress is going to be right back where we are now. So then they tell Ryan we hate you but you can’t leave this job because no one else will do it?

    The Republican party has so institutionalized the crazy as to make being Speaker an impossible job.

  4. The wingnuts whose heads are obviously up their tucheses need to look some more since Daniel Webster R-FL is likely to lose his seat because of an imminent redistricting decision by the FL State Supreme Court.

    The new 27-district map could likely flip a few House seats from Republican to Democrat, and vice versa, in the 2016 election, including one held by Representative Daniel Webster, a conservative Republican from Orlando now vying to become the next speaker of the House. But however much it changes the political balance of power, supporters of the lawsuit say the ruling is a step toward fairer districts, rather than those created out of political calculation.

  5. One of the worst effects of no-show Democratic voters in U.S. history…the 2010 non-voters.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

27 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for dwward Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for sooner Avatar for alcaray Avatar for brooklyndweller Avatar for nowarino Avatar for dopper0189 Avatar for becca656 Avatar for mcbain Avatar for pdxer Avatar for mantan Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for lukeout Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for deputydawg Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for dddinah Avatar for benthere Avatar for gailefranz Avatar for emilianoelmexicano Avatar for jinmichigan Avatar for jakester

Continue Discussion