Utah GOP Lawmakers Seek To Swear To State Ahead Of U.S. Constitution

FILE - This Feb. 20, 2013, file photo, Rep. Brian Greene, R-Pleasant Grove, testifies during a gun bill hearing, at the Utah State Capitol, in Salt Lake City. Lawmakers have debated bills on contentious issues like t... FILE - This Feb. 20, 2013, file photo, Rep. Brian Greene, R-Pleasant Grove, testifies during a gun bill hearing, at the Utah State Capitol, in Salt Lake City. Lawmakers have debated bills on contentious issues like the state's gun laws, including a proposal that declares Utah's authority to regulate firearms in the state, which legislative attorneys said will likely be ruled unconstitutional. Freshman Rep. Brian Greene, sponsored the measure, which he said is an assertion of state's rights and individual liberty. The legislation says that if a judge declares that a state gun law conflicts with a federal law, the state law will be supreme and federal and state officers cannot enforce the federal law. (AP Photo/Rick Bowmer, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Republicans in Utah introduced a measure that would alter their oath of office so that lawmakers would swear to the state constitution before the U.S. constitution.

Rep. Kraig Powell (R) initially proposed a constitutional amendment to change the language in the oath from “this state” to “the State of Utah.”

But on Tuesday, Republicans on the House Revenue and Taxation Committee took Powell’s amendment a step further and proposed putting the Utah Constitution ahead of the U.S. Constitution in the oath, the Salt Lake Tribune reported.

Republican Rep. Brian Greene (pictured above) said the amendment “reflects our duty as state legislators to first and foremost uphold the Constitution and make sure the federal Constitution does not run roughshod over the state Constitution,” according to the Tribune.

“This is a delicate balance and I certainly recognize that, but it’s also a special charge we have as state legislators,” he said.

According to the Tribune, Rep. Jon Stanard (R) opposed the measure, arguing that the U.S. constitution is the “supreme law of the land.”

The committee passed the measure, sending the amendment to the full House for approval. The amendment would need to be approved by two thirds of both the House and Senate, and would then need to be voted on by voters in 2016.

H/t Right Wing Watch

Latest Livewire
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: