Georgia Senate Passes Measure To Move State Line, Claim Tennessee Water

This Wednesday, Oct. 24, 2012 photo shows Chickamauga lock and dam in Chattanooga, Tenn., where U.S. Sen. Lamar Alexander held a news conference to discuss a replacement project. Because of structural safety concerns... This Wednesday, Oct. 24, 2012 photo shows Chickamauga lock and dam in Chattanooga, Tenn., where U.S. Sen. Lamar Alexander held a news conference to discuss a replacement project. Because of structural safety concerns, the existing lock, completed in 1940 on the Tennessee River at Chattanooga, Tenn., must be replaced. (AP Photo/Chattanooga Times Free Press, Allison Love) THE DAILY CITIZEN OUT; NOOGA.COM OUT; CLEVELAND DAILY BANNER OUT; LOCAL INTERNET OUT MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Georgia’s Senate passed a resolution by a vote of 48-2 Monday that would “correct” a portion of the state’s northern border in order to claim valuable water rights from the Tennessee river.

“The Tennessee Valley Authority has identified the Tennessee River as a likely source of water for North Georgia,” said Sen. David Shafer, R-Duluth, in a prepared statement. “Yet the state of Tennessee has used mismarked boundary lines to block our access to this important waterway.”

To settle the cross-state dispute, the bill proposes a solution based on 200-year-old survey errors that would clarify Georgia’s access to the river water, the Chattanooga Times Free Press reports. If no settlement is reached, the Attorney General would be directed to sue the state of Tennessee for the entire area of land south of the 35th parallel.

“Georgia’s streams and creeks feed the Tennessee River,” Shafer added. “In fact, over six percent of the water of the Tennessee River originates in Georgia.”

The resolution now moves back to the House, where it originated, in order to hash out amendments to bill.

(AP Photo)

Latest Livewire
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: