SC Bill: Gay Marriage As Bad As Forced Sterilization, Japanese Internment

South Carolina Equality Board Chairman Jeff Ayers, speaks at a Statehouse rally on Wednesday, Oct. 8, 2014, in Columbia, S.C. Supporters of gay marriage held a rally at the capitol the same day a Charleston County Pr... South Carolina Equality Board Chairman Jeff Ayers, speaks at a Statehouse rally on Wednesday, Oct. 8, 2014, in Columbia, S.C. Supporters of gay marriage held a rally at the capitol the same day a Charleston County Probate judge approved an application for a same-sex marriage license. (AP Photo/Jeffrey Collins) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

An anti-gay marriage bill filed in South Carolina last month compares the Supreme Court’s Obergefell v. Hodges decision that declared marriage a constitutional right for same-sex couples to previous Supreme Court decisions that okayed forced sterilization and Japanese internment.

“[T]he United States Supreme Court is not infallible and has issued lawless decisions which are repulsive to the Constitution and natural law, including Buck v. Bell, Korematsu v. United States, Roe v. Wade, and, most recently, Obergefell v. Hodges,” reads the legislation. It is sponsored by state Reps. William Chumley (R), James Burns (R), Richard Yow (R), and Lonnie Hosey (D).

Buck v. Bell was a 1927 Supreme Court decision upholding a Virginia law that permitted forced sterilization in which Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” In 1944’s Korematsu v. United States, the Supreme Court said the government’s policy of interning Japanese-Americans was constitutional.

The South Carolina bill, prefiled Dec. 3, would attempt to nullify the Supreme Court’s same-sex marriage decision.

“A court decision purporting to strike down natural marriage, including Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S.Ct. 2584 (2015), is unauthoritative, void, and of no effect,” it says.

A similar bill was introduced in Tennessee in September. It, too, makes the comparison of Obergefell v. Hodges to Buck v. Bell and Korematsu v. United States.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. South Carolina is one of the few states that I’ve never visited. I think I’ll give it a miss.

  2. Avatar for meri meri says:

    a) No such thing as “natural marriage”

    b) Being SC, I can’t tell if they’re trying to endorse or attack gay marriage by comparing it to forced sterilization and Japanese internment

  3. Now I’m confused. I thought rightwing nutjobs thought Japanese internment was a good and necessary thing. Make up your minds wingnuts.

  4. [T]he United States Supreme Court is not infallible and has issued lawless decisions which are repulsive to the Constitution and natural law, including Buck v. Bell, Korematsu v. United States, Roe v. Wade, and, most recently, Obergefell v. Hodges,” reads the legislation. It is sponsored by state Reps. William Chumley ®, James Burns ®, Richard Yow ®, and Lonnie Hosey (D).


    The relevant one that wasn’t on the list. After all the justices ignored all of the symptoms surrounding Louisiana’s post Civil War policy towards blacks, because according to a majority of justices, the 14th amendment allowed for discrimination in regards to certain allowances.

    The modern day GOP: Stephen Douglas is a better American compared to that lot.

  5. Avatar for estamm estamm says:

    Wow, they didn’t mention ‘Loving v Virginia’. Imagine that!

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

60 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for estamm Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for meri Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for epicurus Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for jimtoday Avatar for inversion Avatar for mantan Avatar for sniffit Avatar for blueberrytomatosoup Avatar for gregariousred Avatar for sonsofares Avatar for midnight_rambler Avatar for ottnott Avatar for maxaroo Avatar for 538liberal Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for dnl Avatar for darrtown Avatar for beattycat Avatar for jinnj

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: