“Fox & Friends” on Tuesday floated a prediction that women’s magazines as well as children’s shows will end up “in the tank” for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton as the race heats up.
Co-host Elizabeth Hasselbeck surveyed the “unfair” and fawning coverage of Clinton from magazines like Vogue.
“You look at some of the past covers here, and the coverage of the Clinton family in general, it suggests readers will be getting a heavy dose of liberal cheerleading,” Hasselbeck said, stressing the effect such magazines could have on Clinton’s campaign.
Fox contributor Kayleigh McEnany accused the publications of being undeniably partisan.
“If we want to talk about feminism, where is Carly Fiorina? She went from secretary to CEO on her own,” McEnany said, referencing the recently-announced GOP candidate and former chief executive of Hewlett-Packard.
“She didn’t rely on the aid of a cheating husband,” she added.
Later, conservative radio host and frequent Fox guest Laura Ingraham hypothesized that Hillary-mania will go beyond magazine stands and infiltrate children’s programming.
“You will see Hollywood completely motivated to try to get Hillary elected just as they were with the Obamas,” Ingraham said. “It’s going to be ramped up across television. I wouldn’t be surprised if children’s shows had a Hillary push.”
Watch the video over at Mediaite.
As my mother would very likely comment: Nothing going on here but a bunch of cackling.
“She didn’t rely on the aid of a cheating husband,” (McEnany) added.
Nice! Way to ethically implicate and blame the wife for the philandering of her husband! Be sure to trot out footage of this at your yearly review with Roger, dear- he’ll love your shameless duplicity!
Shilling? And what exactly do they call what they do for the Republican clown car?
Yeah, Hillary Clinton will indeed to to get her message out on children’s TV, because she hiopes to sweep the too-young-to-vote vote.
“If we want to talk about feminism, where is Carly Fiorina?”
She’s off promoting male-dominated society’s control over women’s uteruses and employers having the right to interfere with and control their female employees’ health care decisions.
If you’d like to speak with her, you’ll have to wait for her to resurface for another of her speeches denying the existence of the “war on women” and trying to convince the Teatrolls that she’s the candidate to vote for this election cycle because her vajayjay takes away Clinton’s ability to play the “vagina card”.