Report: Feds Investigating Christie’s Use Of Hurricane Sandy Funds For Tourism Ads

Federal officials are looking into whether New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) improperly put Hurricane Sandy relief funds towards Jersey Shore tourism ads, CNN reported Monday.

Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ) told CNN that federal auditors are expected to examine the state’s use of $25 million in Sandy relief funds to market the tourism campaign, which starred Christie and his family. Pallone asked the Department of Housing and Urban Development inspector general in August to look into how Christie spent the funds.

“This was money that could have directly been used for Sandy recovery,” the New Jersey congressman told CNN. “And, as you know, many of my constituents still haven’t gotten the money that is owed them to rebuild their homes or raise their homes or to help.”

Pallone wrote in his letter to HUD that he was concerned about the bidding process for the ads, according to CNN. The winning bid for the marketing plan featuring Christie, he noted, cost $2 million more than the losing firm’s proposal, which did not feature the governor and his family.

A Christie spokesman said Monday in a statement obtained by National Review that the ad campaign, titled “Stronger Than The Storm,” was “developed with the goal of effectively communicating that the Jersey Shore was open for business during the first summer after Sandy” and was approved by the Obama administration.

“Federal agency reviews are routine and standard operating procedure with all federally allocated resources to ensure that funds are distributed fairly,” Christie’s Deputy Communications Director Colin Reed said in the statement, as quoted by National Review. “We’re confident that any review will show that the ads were a key part in helping New Jersey get back on its feet after being struck by the worst storm in state history.”

Christie has been criticized for the tourism ads in the past: Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) suggested that using taxpayer dollars to produce the Jersey Shore ads was a “conflict of interest.”

The probe is not connected to state or federal inquiries into the Christie administration’s involvement in the September lane closures on the George Washington Bridge.

This post has been updated.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Livewire
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: