Elizabeth Warren Says She’s ‘Troubled’ By Reports Of Obama’s $400K Speaking Fee

U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., addresses business leaders during a New England Council luncheon at a hotel, Monday, March 27, 2017, in Boston. (AP Photo/Steven Senne)
U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., addresses business leaders during a New England Council luncheon at a hotel, Monday, March 27, 2017, in Boston. (AP Photo/Steven Senne)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) said Thursday that she is “troubled” by reports that former President Barack Obama agreed to speak for $400,000 at a conference run by an investment bank.

“I was troubled by that,” Warren said on SiriusXM show Alter Family Politics. “The influence of dollars on this place is what scares me. I think it ultimately threatens democracy.”

Fox Business reported Monday that Obama agreed to speak at an annual health care conference run by Wall Street firm Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. for a fee of $400,000. The Financial Times confirmed on Tuesday, citing an unnamed source familiar with the arrangement, that Obama agreed to give a keynote speech at the conference.

“These kinds of objections were raised about President Obama when he was running for office and he got a lot of support from people on Wall Street for his first campaign in 2008,” Obama’s former press secretary Josh Earnest said Thursday morning on MSNBC, where he is a contributor. “But that didn’t in any way limit his ability to put in place the toughest reforms of Wall Street that we had seen in multiple generations.”

“I’ll translate,” Politico and Axios co-founder Jim VandeHei said. “They offered him $400,000, he’s taking it.”

“Capitalism,” Earnest said with a smile.

“It’s a beautiful thing,” anchor Stephanie Ruhle added.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. I’m troubled as well. I have to do at least 2 speaking engagements to clear that much.

  2. For balance, I think the banks should offer Sanders the opportunity to speak, paying him $400 dollars so as to avoid the appearance of corruption.

  3. I’m troubled by the countless ways Elizabeth Warren benefits from capitalist white supremacy. I demand she immediately give up everything it’s given her, and refrain from ever benefiting from it again.

  4. She probably could have gone all week without saying that. Was there really nothing in what current elected officials are doing that was worth noting?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

425 more replies

Participants

Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for kendyzdad Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for brooklyndweller Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for imkmu3 Avatar for clemmers Avatar for chammy Avatar for trumpdog Avatar for impurescience Avatar for inversion Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for jjrothery Avatar for veneita Avatar for darcy Avatar for musgrove Avatar for gideonjones Avatar for tena Avatar for georgeh Avatar for thecaptain Avatar for socalista Avatar for maximus Avatar for hamlet1984

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: