Democrats Release Benghazi Panel Info After McCarthy Remarks

Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., speaks during a media availability, Friday, May 1, 2015 in Baltimore. State's Attorney Marilyn J. Mosby announced criminal charges Friday, against all six officers suspended after Freddi... Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., speaks during a media availability, Friday, May 1, 2015 in Baltimore. State's Attorney Marilyn J. Mosby announced criminal charges Friday, against all six officers suspended after Freddie Gray suffered a fatal spinal injury in police custody in Baltimore. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Noting House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s (R-CA) comment last week about the Benghazi committee’s political success, Democrats on the House Select Committee on Benghazi on Monday circumvented Republicans on the panel to release details from one of the committee’s private interviews with a former aide to Hillary Clinton.

“On September 29, 2015, Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy admitted during a nationally televised interview on Fox News that House Republicans created the Benghazi Select Committee from the very beginning to wage a taxpayer-funded political campaign against Hillary Clinton’s bid for president. Obviously, this is an unethical abuse of millions of taxpayer dollars and a crass assault on the memories of the four Americans who were killed in Benghazi,” the Democrats began in a letter to Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC), the chairman of the select committee, referencing the majority leader’s statements last week.

In the letter, Reps. Elijah Cumming (D-MD), Adam Smith (D-WA), Adam Schiff (D-CA), Linda Sanchez (D-CA), and Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), said that the way Republicans on the committee went about their work shows how political their investigation has been.

“Although some Republicans attempted to explain away Rep. McCarthy’s admission, it reflected exactly what has been going on within the Select Committee for the past year-and-a-half,” the letter continues. “It has held no hearings of any kind since January, and it has completely abandoned its plans to hear public testimony from top defense and intelligence officials so Republicans can focus almost exclusively on Hillary Clinton.”

The Democratic members of the panel then accused the Republican members of using “a series of selective leaks of inaccurate and incomplete information in an effort to attack Secretary Clinton with unsubstantiated or previously debunked allegations.”

In particular, the letter claims that the committee unfairly portrayed its private interview with former Clinton staffer Cheryl Mills by demanding that the interview be treated as classified information and then leaking parts of the interview to the press. The Democratic members included previously unreported excerpts of the interview with Mills in the letter, and they told Gowdy that the State Department and Mills’ lawyers have five days to identify parts of the interview that should remain private before making the entire transcript public.

Read the full letter below, courtesy of The Hill.

Correction: Rep. Cummings is a congressman representing Maryland, not South Carolina.

Read the letter from the Democrats on Benghazi panel by kballuck1

Correction: Rep. Cummings is from Maryland, not South Carolina.

Notable Replies

  1. Repubbies hoist on their own teatard.

  2. “The Democratic members included previously unreported excerpts of the interview with Mills in the letter”

    This is the part where you point out what they are and provide some light analysis instead of implying “read the letter your damn self…we’re too busy tracking down Trump articles.”

  3. And in conclusion, fuck your panel and fuck your witch-hunt.

  4. And so the push to shut down this $4.5 million boondoggle begins.

  5. Basically, they attempted to classify her testimony, after taking numerous steps before, during, and afterwards which would have been illegal if it were classified. (things like, who can be in the room, taking notes…declaring it unclassified at the start, and then leaking the testimony literally within minutes of saying it should be classified).

    They brought up a series of accusations that have already been put to bed during the Issa hearings, which Ms. Mills again debunked, but they went ahead and leaked it without the debunkings…again.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

77 more replies

Participants

Avatar for bluebird Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for alliebean Avatar for lockheedkeynesian Avatar for fgs Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for chammy Avatar for randyabraham Avatar for sniffit Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for johnscotus Avatar for borisjimbo Avatar for taters Avatar for elephant Avatar for railbird Avatar for kitty Avatar for sufi66 Avatar for dickweed Avatar for dnl Avatar for darrtown Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for established_1781 Avatar for briannaamore

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: