Carson Says GOP Wouldn’t Stall SCOTUS Nominees If It Controlled White House

Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson speaks to members of the media, before a Valentine's Day dinner with his wife and a group of doctors during a private event at the Blue Marlin restaurant in Columbia, S.C.... Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson speaks to members of the media, before a Valentine's Day dinner with his wife and a group of doctors during a private event at the Blue Marlin restaurant in Columbia, S.C., Sunday, Feb. 14, 2016. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Republican presidential candidate and retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson conceded in a recent interview that he didn’t think the GOP would stall potential Supreme Court nominees if their own party controlled the White House.

Following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia on Saturday, Republican lawmakers and presidential candidates called on the Senate to not confirm any nominee to replace him until after the 2016 election. In an appearance on South Carolina radio station WRNN, Carson was asked if the presidential candidates on Saturday’s debate stage would have the same position if a Republican controlled the Executive branch.

“No, they wouldn’t,” Carson replied, according to audio flagged Tuesday by BuzzFeed News.

“Recognize that the two picks that the president has selected are ideologues, so there’s really no reason to believe that his next pick wouldn’t be an ideologue also,” Carson added.

Carson said he that he thought the nation’s highest court has become a “political tool” and suggested lifetime appointments should be reexamined.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Carson said he that he thought the nation’s highest court has become a “political tool” and suggested lifetime appointments should be reexamined.

    From one political tool to another? Um… why is ANYONE still listening to this incoherent wanker?

  2. Well no shit.

  3. Avatar for imkmu3 imkmu3 says:

    No shit.

  4. Lifetime appointments should be examined, after we have your head examined. First things first.

  5. …suggested lifetime appointments should be reexamined.

    Unless, of course, you are a conservative, strict constitutionist who thinks the same way Scalia did. He did, after all, “know” what the Founders would have thought if they knew about the present…

    Geeze. Make it stop. This is giving me a huge headache.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

93 more replies

Participants

Avatar for frasca Avatar for ignatius_donnelly Avatar for rob_beatty_walters Avatar for jw1 Avatar for sooner Avatar for charliee Avatar for ronik Avatar for imkmu3 Avatar for leftflank Avatar for bobatkinson Avatar for firstprime Avatar for desertrain Avatar for docmoore Avatar for cvilledem Avatar for inversion Avatar for emjayay Avatar for ottnott Avatar for bd2999 Avatar for jaybeeraybee Avatar for darrtown Avatar for emilianoelmexicano Avatar for beattycat Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for lizzymom

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: