Protester Removed From SCOTUS Courtroom After Anti-Gay Rant

A protestor's sign is seen in front of the Supreme Court in Washington, Tuesday, April 28, 2015. The Supreme Court is set to hear historic arguments in cases that could make same-sex marriage the law of the land. The... A protestor's sign is seen in front of the Supreme Court in Washington, Tuesday, April 28, 2015. The Supreme Court is set to hear historic arguments in cases that could make same-sex marriage the law of the land. The justices are meeting Tuesday to offer the first public indication of where they stand in the dispute over whether states can continue defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman, or whether the Constitution gives gay and lesbian couples the right to marry. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Oral arguments at the Supreme Court in the Obergefell v. Hodges case were interrupted on Tuesday afternoon by a man inside the courtroom screaming his opposition to same-sex marriage, according to multiple news reports.

TPM Bureau Chief David Kurtz, who was reporting from inside the hearing, said a white male stood up and began shouting approximately thirty minutes into the oral argument.

Kurtz was unable to distinguish the exact words of the protester. However, in an audio clip published by WFPL producer Laura Ellis, it’s clear the man yelled, “The bible teaches us that if you support gay marriage, you will burn in hell!” and that gay marriage is an “abomination to god.”

According to SCOTUS Blog, the man continued to shout as security removed him from the courtroom.

After the protester was removed from the courtroom, Justice Antonin Scalia quipped about the interruption, “It was rather refreshing, actually.”

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Hey, Tony, if you thought that was cool, there’s a whole plaza full of folks outside who’d love a gallery seat.

  2. Probably was Scalia’s “Anger Translator.”

  3. Actually that rant will probably help the cause, hopefully a few more nuts will show up. It only will take one of the five conservative justices to say “I’m not with those nuts” to win. Frankly I think it goes 6-3 in favor of gay marriage.

  4. I’m not making any wagers on how this will turn out, but I agree that about 6 or 7 of the 9 Supremes can tell the difference between the 14th Amendment’s equal justice clauses and the bigotry taught by silly 2000-3000 year old religious texts.

  5. Agreed. I think Kennedy and Roberts will both rule for gay marriage. That leaves Thomas, Scalia, and Alito to scurry off and soothe their wounded pride in a totally hetero way.

    As a side note, while I am not a big fan of Roberts’ positions, I have to say that I do think he is doing a good job running the court. And he has not been as repugnant as I thought he would be upon appointment. Alito on the other hand…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

33 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for beccam Avatar for ajm Avatar for fess Avatar for bmcchgo Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for tflick Avatar for bluestatedon Avatar for commenterperson Avatar for opinionated1 Avatar for docmoore Avatar for wwss Avatar for mrcomments Avatar for sniffit Avatar for blueberrytomatosoup Avatar for bigtext Avatar for starquest Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for dnl Avatar for occamsrazor2 Avatar for cjbinks

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: