We’re so thick into constitutional crises today. But you’ve got to read this piece by Josh Kovensky. It’s about how the NRA tried to save itself financially or at least open up a critical new revenue stream by hawking what is not unfairly called “murder insurance.” Basically, if you’re a good guy with a gun and you kill someone, who’s going to cover you expenses? It turns out that even on its own morally dubious terms it wasn’t very good insurance and not necessarily legal. But beyond that, the contractors who created the plans were branching out from old fashioned defending your home style ‘self-defense’ to more like free range out and about waiting for bad guys to show themselves sort of ‘self-defense’. Proactive self-defense. Call it George Zimmerman insurance. Anyway, it’s simultaneously hilarious and really horrifying and on top of all that the NRA seems to have lost some serious cash on it. Read the whole story here.
LATEST
Cafe
What a 2006 Anti-Immigrant Panic Tells Us About Texas in 2026
04.23.26 | 8:00 am
Cafe
Senate Republicans Have a Plan to Suspend Congressional Oversight of ICE for Trump’s Whole Term
04.23.26 | 7:00 am
Where Things Stand
RFK Jr. Is Consistent on One Thing: Denying Cuts Have Been Made to MedicaidÂ
04.22.26 | 5:41 pm
Morning Memo
The Latest DOJ Travesty Is a Dire Warning of the Grave Dangers Ahead
04.22.26 | 10:31 am