We’re so thick into constitutional crises today. But you’ve got to read this piece by Josh Kovensky. It’s about how the NRA tried to save itself financially or at least open up a critical new revenue stream by hawking what is not unfairly called “murder insurance.” Basically, if you’re a good guy with a gun and you kill someone, who’s going to cover you expenses? It turns out that even on its own morally dubious terms it wasn’t very good insurance and not necessarily legal. But beyond that, the contractors who created the plans were branching out from old fashioned defending your home style ‘self-defense’ to more like free range out and about waiting for bad guys to show themselves sort of ‘self-defense’. Proactive self-defense. Call it George Zimmerman insurance. Anyway, it’s simultaneously hilarious and really horrifying and on top of all that the NRA seems to have lost some serious cash on it. Read the whole story here.
LATEST
Five Points
Trump Threatened to Invoke the Insurrection Act — He’ll Need an Insurrection First
01.15.26 | 3:53 pm
News
Fed Judges Rejects GOP Claim That California Maps Were Racially Gerrymandered After SCOTUS Texas Ruling
01.15.26 | 12:04 pm
News
Mahmoud Khalil Can Be Arrested Again, Appeals Court Rules
01.15.26 | 11:31 am
News
What Do Elected Democrats Actually Plan to Do About ICE?
01.15.26 | 11:15 am