We’re so thick into constitutional crises today. But you’ve got to read this piece by Josh Kovensky. It’s about how the NRA tried to save itself financially or at least open up a critical new revenue stream by hawking what is not unfairly called “murder insurance.” Basically, if you’re a good guy with a gun and you kill someone, who’s going to cover you expenses? It turns out that even on its own morally dubious terms it wasn’t very good insurance and not necessarily legal. But beyond that, the contractors who created the plans were branching out from old fashioned defending your home style ‘self-defense’ to more like free range out and about waiting for bad guys to show themselves sort of ‘self-defense’. Proactive self-defense. Call it George Zimmerman insurance. Anyway, it’s simultaneously hilarious and really horrifying and on top of all that the NRA seems to have lost some serious cash on it. Read the whole story here.
LATEST
Cafe
Clearing Up Some Misconceptions About FDR’s Court-Packing Plan
10.21.26 | 1:55 pm
Morning Memo
DOJ’s List of Noncitizen Voters Exposed As Crap
10.21.26 | 11:09 am
The Brief
Todd Blanche Gets Sucked Into Trump World’s Pre-Midterms Drama
10.21.26 | 8:18 am
Where Things Stand
GOP Abandons Republican Incumbent Who Broke With Trump on Blue State Retribution
10.20.26 | 5:44 pm