We’re so thick into constitutional crises today. But you’ve got to read this piece by Josh Kovensky. It’s about how the NRA tried to save itself financially or at least open up a critical new revenue stream by hawking what is not unfairly called “murder insurance.” Basically, if you’re a good guy with a gun and you kill someone, who’s going to cover you expenses? It turns out that even on its own morally dubious terms it wasn’t very good insurance and not necessarily legal. But beyond that, the contractors who created the plans were branching out from old fashioned defending your home style ‘self-defense’ to more like free range out and about waiting for bad guys to show themselves sort of ‘self-defense’. Proactive self-defense. Call it George Zimmerman insurance. Anyway, it’s simultaneously hilarious and really horrifying and on top of all that the NRA seems to have lost some serious cash on it. Read the whole story here.
LATEST
Morning Memo
The Broadview Six Fallout Spreads to Other Cases
06.11.26 | 10:54 am
Where Things Stand
Trump Demonstrates His Willful Ignorance About How Basic Vote Counting Works
06.10.26 | 5:59 pm
News
Trump Administration Killed Criminal Investigation of GOP Senator’s Coal Companies
06.10.26 | 2:00 pm
Five Points
So Far, a Beleaguered Graham Platner Retains Strength in Primary ShowingÂ
06.10.26 | 11:27 am