We’re so thick into constitutional crises today. But you’ve got to read this piece by Josh Kovensky. It’s about how the NRA tried to save itself financially or at least open up a critical new revenue stream by hawking what is not unfairly called “murder insurance.” Basically, if you’re a good guy with a gun and you kill someone, who’s going to cover you expenses? It turns out that even on its own morally dubious terms it wasn’t very good insurance and not necessarily legal. But beyond that, the contractors who created the plans were branching out from old fashioned defending your home style ‘self-defense’ to more like free range out and about waiting for bad guys to show themselves sort of ‘self-defense’. Proactive self-defense. Call it George Zimmerman insurance. Anyway, it’s simultaneously hilarious and really horrifying and on top of all that the NRA seems to have lost some serious cash on it. Read the whole story here.
LATEST
News
Everyone Wants to Win Working-Class Voters. But Have They Realized Many Are Women?
09.07.26 | 8:00 am
The Weekender
Prepare for a Uniquely Cursed Week in American Politics
09.05.26 | 8:00 am
Morning Memo
Trump DOJ Fires Prosecutor in ICE Shooting Case
09.04.26 | 12:00 pm
The Brief
Under Trump’s Executive Order, Sending Mail-in Ballots Could Take Weeks or Years
09.04.26 | 8:16 am