Occupy DC protestors plan on shutting down the Hart Senate Office building at 11:30 AM this morning, which is to say, right about now.
As I said below, there’s value in Senate Democrats remaining united on the jobs bill today because it gives them a clear message. But as Democratic pollster Stan Greenberg points out, voting for the President’s plan is good politics for individual fence-sitting Dems, too. A good point.
Steny Hoyer (D-MD) on this evening’s Senate vote on the jobs bill: “I think you’re correct that if we can’t get 51 Democrats to vote for it, it will clearly be argued by Republicans and construed by all of you as undermining the President’s message.”
Playing off of the “We are the 99%” slogan, right-wingers have started a contending “We are the 53%” — of people who pay income tax vs the loafers and slackers who don’t.
White House: Unanimous Dem support not the right standard for jobs bill.
The White House is saying this afternoon that unanimity among Senate Democrats is not the standard that should be applied to his jobs bill. This is in advance of a vote tonight in the Senate on the bill. Republicans plan to filibuster the bill. So it is a certainty that the bill will not pass because it cannot get 60 votes. The question is whether it could even get 50 votes, which of course comes down to whether the President and Harry Reid can get the support of every or almost every Senate Dem.
The news peg is that the White House is going to go along with breaking the bill into chunks and voting on them individually rather than doing it in one big bill. And that’s supposed to be the White Flag getting run up the flag pole. Read More
As you’ve likely heard, the US government is reporting this afternoon that it has broken up a plot to assassinate the Saudi Ambassador to Washington and to attack the Saudi and Israeli embassies in Washington. Our reporter is at the press conference which is underway at this moment — so we’ll be reporting more shortly.
Here are the two keys though: Listening to the press conference the Justice Department is pushing very hard on the claim of Iranian government complicity. AG Holder spoke of “factions of the Iranian government” being involved. Needless to say, the claim that Iran would try to mount a violent attack in the US capital and trying to assassinate allied foreign ambassadors would have vast and dramatic international implications, to put it mildly. And no doubt — as I listen to the discussion at the press conference — the DOJ officials are pushing the Iranian government role very hard.
Second, the claim is that agents working on behalf or in league with the Iranian government allegedly approached Mexican drug cartels for assistance carrying out the assassination/attack. Given the controversy over the US-Mexican border, the idea that Mexican drug cartels might be involved in such an attack is sure to shoot that controversy to the moon as well.
Our initial read of the court documents suggests that FBI and DEA agents were involved from the first. We’ll bring you more shortly. It sounds at this point that the plot was aspirational until US government agents became involved and worked with the alleged conspirators to move it toward operational. Read More
Listening to Mitt right now at the Christie endorsement press conference he is not shying away from this weekends Mormonism ‘controversy’. Really going in for the kill, sticking the issue to Perry, not waiting for others to do it. Got the lay up from Christie.
With Herman Cain rocketing in the polls, could the Cain-Romney bromance officially end tonight?
The numerical logic is strong. But I actually wonder if Mitt’s going to go down that path. In some ways, Cain could be useful to Romney. I don’t think anyone thinks Herman Cain is going to be the Republican nominee. So he’s a much more convenient person for the right-wing of the party to get all jazzed up about than Rick Perry, who definitely could be the nominee.
Curious what you think.