Why Even Address It?

|
September 10, 2008 11:20 a.m.
EDITORS' NOTE: TPM is making our COVID-19 coverage free to all readers during this national health crisis. If you’d like to support TPM's reporters, editors and staff, the best way to do so is to become a member.

I can’t understand the rationale for Obama to clarify his “lipstick on a pig” remark first thing this morning at the top of his speech. It was a good line. It riffed off of Palin’s lipstick/pitbull line in her acceptance speech. It was pointed, sure. But so what?

Yes, Obama sort of laughed it off and dismissed the criticism with some elan. He wasn’t overly defensive about it, but he was still playing defense. His whole orientation is wrong. Today, you come up with a good new line. You play off of the previous day’s good line. You keep moving the ball forward.

The McCain camp is running an ad linking Obama to sex and children — and Obama is taking valuable time at the beginning of his speech to explain how he wasn’t really indirectly calling Sarah Palin a pig?

As Begala says: Attack! Attack! Attack!

Key Coronavirus Crisis Links

Josh Marshall’s Twitter List of Trusted Experts (Epidemiologists, Researchers, Clinicians, Journalists, Government Agencies) providing reliable real-time information on the COVID-19 Crisis.

Johns Hopkins Global COVID-19 Survey (most up to date numbers globally and for countries around the world).

COVID-19 Tracking Project (updated data on testing and infections in the U.S.).

Worldometers.info (extensive source of information and data visualizations on COVID-19 Crisis — discussion of data here).

More In Edblog
advertisement
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Senior Editor:
Special Projects Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Publishing Associate:
Front-End Developer:
Senior Designer: