In his concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas writes that he would have struck down Section 5, too: “By leaving the inevitable conclusion unstated, the Court needlessly prolongs the demise of that provision. For the reasons stated in the Court’s opinion, I would find §5 unconstitutional.”
LATEST
News
Today’s Census Attacks Mirror a Century Old Republican-Led Constitutional Crisis
08.14.26 | 4:11 pm
Morning Memo
CIA Behind Mystery Strikes on Ecuadorian Fishing Boats
08.14.26 | 11:27 am
Cafe
Is Paramount’s Merger-Hungry David Ellison Making it Up As He Goes?
08.14.26 | 10:49 am
News
OLC’s New Opinion on Executive Privilege Is a ‘Devious Tactic’ to Cover Up Trump Admin Corruption
08.14.26 | 8:00 am