In his concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas writes that he would have struck down Section 5, too: “By leaving the inevitable conclusion unstated, the Court needlessly prolongs the demise of that provision. For the reasons stated in the Court’s opinion, I would find §5 unconstitutional.”
LATEST
The Weekender
A Case Study in How Trump Treats His Friends
04.04.26 | 8:00 am
News
Small Businesses Are Being Left Out of Tariff Refund Process, CBP Data Suggests
04.03.26 | 1:06 pm
Morning Memo
Donald Trump Is the Worst Attorney General in History
04.03.26 | 10:36 am
Where Things Stand
What Trump Might See in Lee Zeldin
04.02.26 | 5:55 pm