In his concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas writes that he would have struck down Section 5, too: “By leaving the inevitable conclusion unstated, the Court needlessly prolongs the demise of that provision. For the reasons stated in the Court’s opinion, I would find §5 unconstitutional.”
LATEST
Where Things Stand
Rampant MAGAworld Self-Dealing Hits a Snag
10.22.26 | 5:21 pm
The Franchise
Missouri Republicans Try To Trick Voters Out of Abortion Rights
10.22.26 | 1:58 pm
Cafe
Donald Trump’s Reality-TV Presidency Has Entered its Desperate Gimmick Phase
10.22.26 | 1:38 pm
News
Some Ohio Republicans Embrace, Some Scurry Away from Appalling Ramaswamy Ad
10.22.26 | 12:38 pm