In his concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas writes that he would have struck down Section 5, too: “By leaving the inevitable conclusion unstated, the Court needlessly prolongs the demise of that provision. For the reasons stated in the Court’s opinion, I would find §5 unconstitutional.”
LATEST
News
Trump Successfully Boots Sen. Bill Cassidy From His Seat
05.16.26 | 10:58 pm
The Weekender
How Trump and His Famous Golfer Buddy Are Trying to Sportswash the Presidency
05.16.26 | 8:00 am
News
Polis Commutes Sentence of Election-Denying Former County Clerk Tina Peters
05.15.26 | 5:33 pm
Morning Memo
Trump’s New $1.7 BILLION Slush Fund Boondoggle
05.15.26 | 10:46 am