In his concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas writes that he would have struck down Section 5, too: “By leaving the inevitable conclusion unstated, the Court needlessly prolongs the demise of that provision. For the reasons stated in the Court’s opinion, I would find §5 unconstitutional.”
LATEST
Where Things Stand
Trump Is Now Framing His Blue State Retribution Campaign as Some Sort Of Deliverance
01.13.26 | 6:31 pm
News
How a Grainy Video of Renee Good’s Anguished Wife Convinced Right-Wing Media to Blame the Widow
01.13.26 | 5:48 pm
News
Alito and Kavanaugh Give Fox News-esque Recitation of Anti-Trans Talking Points
01.13.26 | 3:36 pm
News
Right-Wing Justices Warm to Idea that Trans Minority Too Small to Challenge Sports Bans
01.13.26 | 2:44 pm