In his concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas writes that he would have struck down Section 5, too: “By leaving the inevitable conclusion unstated, the Court needlessly prolongs the demise of that provision. For the reasons stated in the Court’s opinion, I would find §5 unconstitutional.”
LATEST
Where Things Stand
Georgia Republicans See Writing on the Wall
06.17.26 | 6:30 pm
News
Trump Upends Plans To Quickly Confirm His Own DNI Nominee, Prompting Intra-GOP Quarrel
06.17.26 | 4:06 pm
Morning Memo
Broadview Six Seek Special Counsel to Probe Trump DOJ
06.17.26 | 11:18 am
News
Fed Chair Kevin Warsh Heads to First Rate Decision Under a Cloud of Distrust About His Independence
06.17.26 | 7:00 am