In his concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas writes that he would have struck down Section 5, too: “By leaving the inevitable conclusion unstated, the Court needlessly prolongs the demise of that provision. For the reasons stated in the Court’s opinion, I would find §5 unconstitutional.”
LATEST
News
Read: The ‘Emergency’ Executive Order Proposal That Trump Activists are Rallying Behind
02.27.26 | 3:39 pm
News
Even In Trump Country, State Election Officials Buck DOJ’s Latest Attempt to Seize Voter Rolls
02.27.26 | 11:31 am
Morning Memo
3 Revealing Moments from a Year of Trump II Legal Fights
02.27.26 | 11:21 am
News
The Trump DOJ’s Defense Of The Abrego Garcia Prosecution Only Works If You Squint Real Hard
02.26.26 | 6:42 pm