In his concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas writes that he would have struck down Section 5, too: “By leaving the inevitable conclusion unstated, the Court needlessly prolongs the demise of that provision. For the reasons stated in the Court’s opinion, I would find §5 unconstitutional.”
LATEST
The Brief
Under Trump’s Executive Order, Sending Mail-in Ballots Could Take Weeks or Years
09.04.26 | 8:16 am
News
How a Baseless, Right-Wing Social Media Panic Led to Dramatic Changes at the Census Bureau
09.04.26 | 7:00 am
Where Things Stand
Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill Cleared the Way for More Data Centers. Dems Are Hoping You Know That.
09.03.26 | 5:39 pm
News
White House Iran War Denialism Reaches Absurd New Level in Briefing Where Vance Both Confirms and Denies Bullets Are Flying
09.03.26 | 5:36 pm