In his concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas writes that he would have struck down Section 5, too: “By leaving the inevitable conclusion unstated, the Court needlessly prolongs the demise of that provision. For the reasons stated in the Court’s opinion, I would find §5 unconstitutional.”
LATEST
News
Senate Dems Will Attempt to Stop Trump White House’s Latest Illegal Pocket Rescission
09.30.26 | 2:44 pm
Morning Memo
Appeals Courts Slowly Awaken to Trump II Threat
09.30.26 | 11:31 am
News
Republicans Can’t Stop Talking About Banning Trans Athletes
09.30.26 | 8:31 am
The Brief
5 Points About a Senator’s Disastrous But Hilarious Attempt to Accuse Jack Smith of Perjury
09.30.26 | 8:11 am