In his concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas writes that he would have struck down Section 5, too: “By leaving the inevitable conclusion unstated, the Court needlessly prolongs the demise of that provision. For the reasons stated in the Court’s opinion, I would find §5 unconstitutional.”
LATEST
Where Things Stand
Bannon Describes Vision for ICE At Polling Places That Dems Have Been Warning About
02.04.26 | 5:50 pm
News
Dems Outline Their Demands for ICE As Republicans Promise to Shoot Down Basic Reforms
02.04.26 | 5:29 pm
News
Economic Experts Skeptical Trump Fed Chair Pick Will Be Free from Political Influence
02.04.26 | 10:30 am
Morning Memo
The Trump DOJ Has Utterly Collapsed and It Ain’t Pretty
02.04.26 | 10:24 am