In his concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas writes that he would have struck down Section 5, too: “By leaving the inevitable conclusion unstated, the Court needlessly prolongs the demise of that provision. For the reasons stated in the Court’s opinion, I would find §5 unconstitutional.”
LATEST
Unsanctioned
Why the Trump DOJ Is More of a Wreck Than Ever
11.13.26 | 11:56 am
The Brief
Chuck Schumer Gets a Challenge For Majority Leader
11.13.26 | 8:13 am
Cafe
Trump Is Still Giving Orders. Are Republicans Still Taking Them?
11.13.26 | 6:00 am
Where Things Stand
Trump Forces Vance to Focus on His Retribution Campaign — Not 2028
11.12.26 | 5:28 pm