Over at TPMCafe’s Table for One, Charlie Savage has a very interesting post on the strategy behind the Bush Administration’s selection of Supreme Court nominees. He argues, pretty persuasively, that nominees were vetted more for their adherence to a philosophy of expansive presidential power than for their positions on the social issues that dominate the Supreme Court confirmation process.
LATEST
News
His ‘Lifetime Mantra’ is ‘Standing up to Bullies.’ Now, He’s Running Against an Islamophobe Who Wants to Deport 100 Million People.
10.27.26 | 11:57 am
Morning Memo
3 Big Losses for Trump in One Long Day of Setbacks
10.27.26 | 11:15 am
The Brief
DOJ Tells Washington State To Set Aside Ballots of 400 Voters It Claims are Noncitizens
10.27.26 | 8:17 am
News
9th Circuit Rejects Trump Appeal in CA Election Case
10.26.26 | 6:58 pm