Over at TPMCafe’s Table for One, Charlie Savage has a very interesting post on the strategy behind the Bush Administration’s selection of Supreme Court nominees. He argues, pretty persuasively, that nominees were vetted more for their adherence to a philosophy of expansive presidential power than for their positions on the social issues that dominate the Supreme Court confirmation process.
LATEST
Morning Memo
Trump DOJ Fires Prosecutor in ICE Shooting Case
09.04.26 | 12:00 pm
The Brief
Under Trump’s Executive Order, Sending Mail-in Ballots Could Take Weeks or Years
09.04.26 | 8:16 am
News
How a Baseless, Right-Wing Social Media Panic Led to Dramatic Changes at the Census Bureau
09.04.26 | 7:00 am
Where Things Stand
Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill Cleared the Way for More Data Centers. Dems Are Hoping You Know That.
09.03.26 | 5:39 pm