Over at TPMCafe’s Table for One, Charlie Savage has a very interesting post on the strategy behind the Bush Administration’s selection of Supreme Court nominees. He argues, pretty persuasively, that nominees were vetted more for their adherence to a philosophy of expansive presidential power than for their positions on the social issues that dominate the Supreme Court confirmation process.
LATEST
Five Points
Five Takeaways From Trump’s Plodding, Scattered, and at Times Eerie State of the Union
02.24.26 | 11:35 pm
Where Things Stand
Oversight Dem Says DOJ ‘Appears to Have Illegally Withheld FBI Interviews’ Around Trump Accusation
02.24.26 | 5:09 pm
News
Immigration Court Watchers Will Be Front and Center at Trump’s State of the Union
02.24.26 | 4:07 pm
Five Points
Five Points on the Rep. Tony Gonzales Affair Allegations Disrupting the Texas Primaries
02.24.26 | 2:16 pm