Over at TPMCafe’s Table for One, Charlie Savage has a very interesting post on the strategy behind the Bush Administration’s selection of Supreme Court nominees. He argues, pretty persuasively, that nominees were vetted more for their adherence to a philosophy of expansive presidential power than for their positions on the social issues that dominate the Supreme Court confirmation process.
LATEST
Cafe
Hantavirus, Ebola and Our Dark New Era of Virus Conspiracy Theories
05.23.26 | 9:00 am
The Weekender
What’s Going on With Trump’s Big Fascistic Arch Near the National Mall?
05.23.26 | 8:00 am
News
How Fred Trump’s Mysterious KKK Riot Arrest Resonates Almost a Century Later
05.23.26 | 8:00 am
News
BREAKING: Abrego Garcia Prevails on Vindictive Prosecution Claim
05.22.26 | 3:07 pm