Over at TPMCafe’s Table for One, Charlie Savage has a very interesting post on the strategy behind the Bush Administration’s selection of Supreme Court nominees. He argues, pretty persuasively, that nominees were vetted more for their adherence to a philosophy of expansive presidential power than for their positions on the social issues that dominate the Supreme Court confirmation process.
LATEST
The Weekender
The Bizarre AI Ad Trying to Make an Extremist Candidate Look Like Jesus
10.03.26 | 8:00 am
Morning Memo
Bill Pulte Guts the IG Office That Investigated Him
10.02.26 | 11:57 am
News
A State That Enshrined Abortion Into Its Constitution Is Now at Risk of Losing It
10.02.26 | 10:36 am
The Brief
JD Vance Says Black, Socialist Candidate for Senate Doesn’t ‘Belong in America’
10.02.26 | 8:21 am