Now That You Mention It

Fox News moderators from left, Chris Wallace, Megyn Kelly and Bret Baier speak to the camera before Republican presidential candidates New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., Ben Carson, Wisconsin G... Fox News moderators from left, Chris Wallace, Megyn Kelly and Bret Baier speak to the camera before Republican presidential candidates New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., Ben Carson, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, Donald Trump, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., and Ohio Gov. John Kasich take the stage for the first Republican presidential debate at the Quicken Loans Arena, Thursday, Aug. 6, 2015, in Cleveland. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

It’s a bit ironic, given where we are now. But I think this point from TPM Reader PS at least deserves some discussion. It seems pretty clear that the word came down from Murdoch during that first debate that the moderators should rough Trump up – not because he was the emerging frontrunner and needed scrutiny but because he wasn’t the Fox-preferred candidate. As I predicted that evening, it was quite likely to backfire. And it did. But that’s at least problematic for someone lined up to host one of the presidential debates.

The most important thing in Gabriel Sherman’s article about Roger Ailes, by far is actually not one of the five points listed by Katharine Krueger in her recent piece. (Does the American public really need to care that Ailes’s wife is about to leave him?)

The most newsworthy thing—and a genuinely astonishing finding—is that the moderator of the third scheduled presidential debate has already ‘thrown’ the questions for a televised debate at least once at the insistence of Rupert Murdoch, conveyed by Ailes, specifically in order to politically harm Murdoch’s least preferred candidate, Donald Trump.

Please, please point out to your readers how insanely inappropriate and unjournalistic this behavior is—‘hammering’ a candidate, in the Fox News source’s words, at the dictation of his boss, for political purposes—and how completely it disqualifies Chris Wallace from moderating further debates.

This deserves to be an absolutely enormous issue, now that it has been reported openly.

It means that Wallace will be unusually hard on Trump, to try to overcome the accusation of misconduct in his previous outing; or unusually hard on Clinton, for ‘balance’; or unusually hard on Clinton, simply because he is a conservative used to following instructions from a conservative mogul.

None of these possibilities is tolerable for the debates, or for deliberative democracy. Chris Wallace should be disqualified immediately, now that Gabriel Sherman has reported on this jaw-dropping misconduct in the first Republican primary debate.

Latest Editors' Blog
  • |
    December 24, 2024 12:22 p.m.

    Here’s some Christmas Eve entertainment for you. By perhaps making Mike Johnson unelected as Speaker (not a done deal but…

  • |
    December 23, 2024 12:18 p.m.

    Just an update: There are currently 47 tickets remaining for TPM’s first live podcast taping, which will take place on…

  • |
    December 20, 2024 11:07 p.m.

    As of Friday evening it appears that the Trump/Musk GOP has managed to put out, or at least move to…

  • |
    December 20, 2024 2:00 p.m.

    I admit I’ve been saying mostly the same thing in my last few posts on events on Capitol Hill. I…

Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: