Let me follow up on the Shuster story by agreeing with Atrios. I referenced this briefly in the post below. But, setting aside the language Shuster used, I don’t get what’s ‘unseemly’ or weird about Chelsea playing any role she wants in her mother’s presidential campaign. Many of us may remember her from when she was twelve, or whatever age she was. But I think she’s almost thirty years old. So I’m not being rhetorical when I say I don’t even know what that’s about. I find it mystifying.
Meanwhile, Greg Sargent brings us more background on the contretemps and negotiations taking place now between Hillary’s campaign and NBC and how that upcoming debate figures in.
