But, of course, Craig isn’t mounting that sort of bold defense that admits he is what he is and denounces the “pre-Stonewall morality fable” unfolding here. Instead, he’s rather implausibly denying that he ever went in for anonymous gay sex. At this point, Craig becomes a liar and a buffoon in ways that seem to be firing offenses on their own terms.
Perhaps this is not the best part of me. But I must confess that quite apart from the larger issues of public and private, public acceptance of homosexuality and Republican politics, I am in favor of an aggressive defense on Craig’s part simply because I cannot resist the novelistic clash of pathos, hypocrisy and ridiculousness of seeing Craig’s effort to ‘clear his good name’ torpedoing the White House’s September Petraeus propaganda campaign.
