Another Player in the Story

Victor Boyarkin (Facebook)

“He owed us a lot of money. And he was offering ways to pay it back.”

That’s the most intriguing and enticing quote from an article published today by Time. The quote is from a guy named Victor Boyarkin, who Time tracked down at a conference in Greece, apparently after quite a bit of sleuthing. Boyarkin works for Oleg Deripaska, the Russian oligarch and he’s talking about Paul Manafort.

Boyarkin just got on the US latest sanctions list earlier this month and, as the article describes, he’s someone who’s spent a life at the intersection of “Russian espionage, diplomacy and the arms trade.” But in recent years he’s worked for Deripaska and he drew the assignment to collect the money Manafort owed his boss. “I came down on [Manafort] hard,” he told Time, after he consented to a generally unresponsive interview.

A lot of this story we know. Manafort owed Deripaska millions of dollars. He was broke. Once he hooked up with Trump in early 2016 he tried to offer his newfound clout and access as a way to get back into Deripaska’s good graces. Here we have mainly more detail and color. But in addition to that color, we get a fuller picture of the way Russia’s government used its hold over various oligarchs to subvert or suborn foreign governments while leaving a bit of distance and deniability for the Russian government itself.

Montenegro was another place Deripaska and Manafort worked together, first a decade ago and then much more recently. Manafort was pitching his services there, apparently as part of his continuing relationship with Deripaska, only weeks after he got booted from the Trump campaign in August 2016.

This is another article that helps see the bigger picture beyond individual emails and meetings and who exactly denies or admits to some meeting. Manafort worked for the same Russian oligarch (with or through, depending on your perspective) in Ukraine, Montenegro and various other countries. His appearance in US politics, running the campaign of the future President, fits the model from those other countries pretty much exactly.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Edblog
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: