Newt Gingrich respondsOr well

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Newt Gingrich responds!

Or well … kinda!

On Monday I accused Newt Gingrich of lying when he claimed that soon-to-be-Minnesota Senate candidate Walter Mondale supported Social Security privatization. Now Rick Tyler, Director of Media Relations for Gingrich Communications, responds …

Josh,

Look at the quote:

“Walter Mondale chaired a commission that was for the privatization of
Social Security worldwide,” Gingrich said. “He chaired a commission that
was for raising the retirement age dramatically. He has a strong record of
voting to raise taxes. . . . think that what you’ll see on the Republican
side is an issue-oriented campaign that says, you know, if you want to raise
your retirement age dramatically and privatize Social Security, Walter
Mondale is a terrifically courageous guy to say that.”

Walter Mondale DID chair a commission the was FOR the privatization of
Social Security. He DID chair a commission that was FOR raising the
retirement age.

No where doe the Speaker say that Mondale was for it but that the commission
he chaired was for it. Shouldn’t Mondale have to answer for a commision’s
finding that he chaired?

Best regards,
Rick Tyler
Director of Media Relations
Gingrich Communications

(Email published with author’s permission.)

Now, as I told Rick when he and I exchanged emails about this, I don’t find this a terribly convincing argument. Doesn’t this get us into what the meaning of ‘is’ is territory?

The obvious intent of Gingrich’s statement is to say that Mondale supports privatization. Even if the statement is technically true, as Tyler argues, it is so willfully misleading as, for my money, to constitute a deception. In fact, it almost seems worse since one might have assumed that Gingrich was just going on bad information and didn’t know that Mondale had officially dissented from the privatization recommendation. But apparently not. The statement was just willfully deceptive.

I’d come up with a few analogies for how ridiculous an argument this is. But now you’ve heard from both sides. I’ll let readers decide.

Latest Editors' Blog
  • |
    April 22, 2024 1:31 p.m.

    Like David, I’m still not clear that we have a satisfying explanation of just why the last week on Capitol…

  • |
    April 22, 2024 11:59 a.m.

    Opening statements are complete in the Trump trial, and our Josh Kovensky has done a tremendous job covering it in…

  • |
    April 20, 2024 5:13 p.m.

    Let me return to add a few more thoughts on what happened between Israel and Iran. Iran launched a massive…

  • |
    April 19, 2024 11:43 a.m.

    I hope you get a chance to read Josh Kovensky’s trial report from yesterday. He gets at a really good…

Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: