Trump Surrogates Defend His Debate Promise To Put Clinton In Jail

FILE - In this June 30, 2010 file photo, Senate Judiciary Committee member, Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., is seen on Capitol Hill in Washington. Sessions told reporters Thursday, the president should take responsibilit... FILE - In this June 30, 2010 file photo, Senate Judiciary Committee member, Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., is seen on Capitol Hill in Washington. Sessions told reporters Thursday, the president should take responsibility for the Secret Service, GSA and energy company Solyndra scandals and insist on a government culture in which taxpayer dollars are not wasted. He said, "I don't sense that this president has shown that kind of managerial leadership." (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

ST. LOUIS, MO — Donald Trump surrogates, including a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, defended his promise to sic his Department of Justice on Hillary Clinton, while a Democratic senator supporting Clinton called the remark one of the worst moments of the debate.

Trump said that Clinton “would be in jail” if he was president and that he would “instruct the attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation.”

In the spin room after the debate, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), one of Trump’s earliest supporters who also sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which has oversight over the federal judicial system, seemed a little thrown off, at first, by TPM’s question whether that was an appropriate use of the political system.

“Well, I like that he said a special prosecutor, and so, I, uh, think one might be justified, we will have to see about that, I haven’t studied it,” Sessions said. “But he didn’t say that he was going to direct a prosecutor to bring charges. He just said a special prosecutor to investigate, and that would be an independent prosecutor to investigate, and that would be an independent prosecutor in the special prosecutor system, not one picked by the president.”

(Trump said that he would instruct the AG to get a special prosecutor, and that “We’re going to get a special prosecutor because people have been, their lives have been destroyed for doing one fifth of what you’ve done.”)

Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO), a Clinton surrogate, brought up the comment when a reporter asked her what Trump’s worst debate moments were.

“The notion that he would stand up there and say, ‘I am going to prosecute Hillary Clinton and you belong in jail,’ it’s irresponsible and it’s insulting to the FBI,” she said.

Former Attorney General Eric Holder responded to Trump’s remark on Twitter, calling it “dangerous” and arguing that Trump was “promising to abuse the power of the office.”

But Trump’s supporters saw no such dangers in the legal and political implication of Trump’s vow.

“Look, there were federal laws that were broken,” Jason Miller, a Trump campaign spokesman and former Senate staffer, said in the spin room. “Why do you think that five people took immunity deals in this? This is why people call her crooked Hillary Clinton, we saw the Fox News poll that came out last Friday, 52 percent think the name ‘crooked’ applies to Hillary Clinton, so it was ridiculous. It was very clear the laws have been broken here. “

Rep. Jason Smith (R-MO) also defended Trump’s promise.

“I have heard several members of Congress do the same thing,” he said.

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. Yea ? ? … That’s why we’re going to change the makeup of Congress TOO …

    Fuckers ! — (

  2. Avatar for johnn johnn says:

    Rep. Jason Smith (R-MO) also defended Trump’s promise.

    “I have heard several members of Congress do the same thing,” he said.

    NAME 'EM, JASON!

  3. For some reason it really pisses me off that his supporters are too dumb to realize that the immunity deals indicate that the FBI was trying to nail Hillary rather than find “wrongdoing”.

    Without the immunity deals those people who would have stayed completely silent and there would be even less on Hillary (although admittedly it’s hard to get less than 0).

  4. “Look, there were federal laws that were broken” - When 52% in a Fox News poll talk, Justice listens.

  5. Just another indication that the right wing has taken away the wrong lessons from Watergate.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

30 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for frasca Avatar for josephebacon Avatar for jootjoint Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for mollynyc Avatar for cwazycajun Avatar for weirdnoise Avatar for sherlock1 Avatar for borisjimbo Avatar for go2goal Avatar for addicted4444 Avatar for neal_anderthal Avatar for kitty Avatar for dickweed Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for azjude Avatar for zlohcuc Avatar for meta Avatar for ljb860 Avatar for jonnygee Avatar for johnn Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for redhand

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: