Rubio Reveals Russian Hackers Targeted His Presidential Campaign Staff

In the Senate Intelligence Committee’s first open hearing on Russian meddling in the 2016 election, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) revealed that Russian hackers may have targeted his former presidential campaign staffers—as recently as this week.

In the morning session of the hearing, former FBI agent Clint Watts said he believed Rubio was among the candidates from both parties that Russia aimed to discredit due in particular to their “adversarial views towards the Kremlin.” Rubio did not respond to the allegation in that morning session, and his office did not respond to TPM’s request for comment.

But when the hearing reconvened in the afternoon, Rubio said that while he couldn’t comment on the former agent’s allegation that he was targeted during his bid for the Republican presidential nomination, he could confirm he has been targeted at least twice since bowing out.

“In July of 2016, shortly after I announced I would seek re-election to the United States Senate, former members of my presidential campaign team who had access to the internal information of my presidential campaign were targeted by I.P. addresses with an unknown location within Russia,” he said. “That effort was unsuccessful.”

“I’d also inform the committee that within the last 24 hours, at 10:45 a.m. yesterday, a second attempt was made, again against former members of my presidential campaign team who had access to our internal information, again targeted from an I.P. address from an unknown location in Russia,” he continued. “That effort was also unsuccessful.”

The Senate Intelligence Committee is examining, among other factors, Russia’s use of hacking, selective leaking and social media bots to spread disinformation and create political divisions to weaken confidence in the American electoral system.

Rubio noted the hacking directed at his own campaign, as well as that of Hillary Clinton, is “just a tactic to further the broader goal.”

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Dc
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: