5 GOP Senators Propose Delay On O’Care Repeal To Work Out Replacement

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, ranking member on the Senate Aging Committee speaks on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Sept. 10, 2014, during the committee's hearing to examine older Americans and student loan d... Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, ranking member on the Senate Aging Committee speaks on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Sept. 10, 2014, during the committee's hearing to examine older Americans and student loan debt. (AP Photo/Lauren Victoria Burke) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

After publicly airing some of their grievances with the GOP’s current strategy of repealing Obamacare without a replacement plan, a handful of Republican senators put their concerns in legislative writing. Five senators on Monday evening introduced a measure that would delay the next steps on repealing the Affordable Care Act by more than a month. The senators, in their statements accompanying the provision, said the delay would buy Congress more time to work out of the the details of a replacement.

“This amendment will ensure that we move forward with a smart, responsible plan to replace the law as quickly as possible,” said Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH) in a statement announcing the measure. He was joined by Bob Corker (R-TN), Susan Collins (R-ME), Bill Cassidy (R-LA.) and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) in introducing the proposal.

The proposal would amend the budget resolution currently being considered by the Senate that is supposed to act as a vehicle for the Republicans’ repeal effort. The budget resolution as it now stands directs the relevant committees in the House and Senate to come up with the actual repeal legislation that will be passed through the process known as reconciliation, which requires only a majority vote in the Senate. The budget resolution, which was introduced last week, gives the committees until Jan. 27 to submit their repeal bills for the next steps in the legislative process.

In contrast, the amendment introduced Monday evening would extend that deadline until March 3, so that the incoming Health and Human Services secretary (likely Georgia GOP Rep. Tom Price) has “adequate time to review what the Trump administration can repeal and replace administratively versus legislatively, and ensure that Congress puts in place a responsible timeline for replacing the law,” according to the amendment’s press release.

On the House side, rank and file members have expressed a desire to slow the process as well. After a meeting Monday evening at Tortilla Coast, a restaurant near the Capitol, Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC), the chair of the House Freedom Caucus, said that there was an “overwhelming consensus” among the group of conservative hardliners that they’d like to see more specifics about the plan to repeal and replace Obamacare before voting on the budget resolution, which is expected to be up for a vote in the House this week.

Latest DC
76
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. GOP: Traitors among us.

  2. “Hey prof, I need an extension for my term paper.”
    “It’s a…term paper…”
    “So that’s a yes?”

  3. Here’s a helpful hint, Mitch: File this under “Brewing, Shit Storm”

  4. They really, really don’t care what happens to ANYONE with just a few exceptions, like Sen. Collins pictured above, but even she has put party over country time and again.

  5. Avatar for pshah pshah says:

    ter a meeting Monday evening at Tortilla Coast, a restaurant near the Capitol, Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC), the chair of the House Freedom Caucus, said that there was an “overwhelming consensus” among the group of conservative hardliners that they’d like to see more specifics about the plan to repeal and replace Obamacare before voting on the budget resolution, which is expected to be up for a vote in the House this week.

    More specifics? Why? I was under the impression Obamacare was the worst thing to befall mankind since Adam and Eve were banished from the Garden of Eden. Please don’t tell me it was all just political posturing for the Tea Partiers.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

70 more replies

Participants

Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for ajaykalra Avatar for marby Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for wdking Avatar for thx1138 Avatar for inlabsitrust Avatar for randyabraham Avatar for inversion Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for ottnott Avatar for uk_observer Avatar for hjs62 Avatar for hallam Avatar for louydepalma Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for spencersmom Avatar for cec327 Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for polisong Avatar for overthefall96 Avatar for kumquat16 Avatar for highplainslawyer Avatar for sea16

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: