ACLU Accuses Trump Admin Of Misleading Parents, Rushing Deportations

NEW YORK, NY - JULY 18: Activists, including childcare providers, parents and their children, protest against the Trump administrations recent family detention and separation policies for migrants along the southern... NEW YORK, NY - JULY 18: Activists, including childcare providers, parents and their children, protest against the Trump administrations recent family detention and separation policies for migrants along the southern border, near the New York offices of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), July 18, 2018 in New York City. On Wednesday, the GOP-led House of Representatives passed a resolution supporting ICE and denounced calls by some Democrats and progressive activists to abolish ICE. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images) MORE LESS

In a new court filing Wednesday afternoon, the American Civil Liberties Union accused the Trump administration of presenting separated parents with their legal options in a “coercive and misleading manner,” leading many of those parents to sign deportations papers renouncing their right to be reunited with their children without fully understanding the consequences.

The ACLU is demanding U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw, who ordered the government to reunify most separated families by Thursday, to block the administration from deporting any parents until they have had at least seven days post-reunification to talk to their children and an attorney about “what might be the most consequential decision of their lives.” After keeping parents and children apart for months with little communication, the filing argues, “the Government should not now be able to argue that it cannot wait a mere 7 days to remove these families, so that they can be advised on their life-altering decisions.”

With more than 100 pages of testimony gathered by the ACLU’s attorneys at immigration detention centers, the filing argues that the separated parents are currently not receiving due process despite Judge Sabraw’s ruling in their favor. The ACLU is representing parents of separated immigrant families in the class action lawsuit.

The Trump administration is presenting the parents with a court-ordered form describing their rights under the class action lawsuit and giving them choice between leaving their child in the U.S., being deported as a family, or staying and seeking asylum. But the ACLU says many parents were given the form in a language they do not speak, were given mere minutes to make the decision, and were told incorrectly that their right to be reunited with their child was conditioned on them dropping their asylum claims.

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, an attorney with the American Immigration Council, said in an affidavit submitted to the court that out of the more than 90 parents his team interviewed over the last few days, 52 had signed papers giving up their right to get their children back. Several had been given the forms in a language they do not speak.

“Many of these individuals indicated that they felt coerced into relinquishing their rights,” he wrote. “Still others appeared totally unaware that they had done so. Indeed, some individuals were adamant that they had signed a paper that said they had chosen to be reunited with their children.”

The ACLU warns that unless the judge intervenes, deportations without informed consent are sure to spike in the coming days. With the Trump administration rushing to reunify families by the Thursday deadline, hundreds of families will be arriving at once at the family detention centers in Texas designated to receive them, and hundreds have final orders of removal. There, they can only meet with attorneys within certain hours and when there is space available — one facility has only five rooms for attorney-client consultations.

A week is necessary post-reunification, the ACLU argues, because “sometimes initial meetings are too difficult because the parents are too traumatized to even receive basic advisals.”

Read the ACLU’s filing below:

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest Dc
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: