Politicians Need To Work For Voters, Not Extremists

Elected officials' attacks on election workers are a dangerous new form of radicalism.
WILKES-BARRE, PENNSYLVANIA, UNITED STATES - 2020/11/11: A protester holds a placard and a flag during the demonstration.A group of approximately 25 people in support of Donald Trump marched around Public Square shouting "Stop the Steal" and demanding a recount of votes in Pennsylvania. (Photo by Aimee Dilger/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
WILKES-BARRE, PENNSYLVANIA, UNITED STATES - 2020/11/11: A protester holds a placard and a flag during the demonstration. A group of approximately 25 people in support of Donald Trump marched around Public Square shou... WILKES-BARRE, PENNSYLVANIA, UNITED STATES - 2020/11/11: A protester holds a placard and a flag during the demonstration. A group of approximately 25 people in support of Donald Trump marched around Public Square shouting "Stop the Steal" and demanding a recount of votes in Pennsylvania. (Photo by Aimee Dilger/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

This article is part of TPM Cafe, TPM’s home for opinion and news analysis.

James Madison wrote in Federalist 49 that “the people are the only legitimate fountain of power.” Today’s overheated Pennsylvania Republican politicians seeking to undermine our elections would do well to cool off in that fountain. 

Since the election, these politicians have eagerly forgotten that they report to the voters, not the other way around. Supported by extremist rhetoric, some politicians and pundits have launched a bevy of baseless attacks on the election results simply because they don’t like them. But perhaps even more pernicious are the jabs at election officials for the high crime of doing what the Constitution says.

Sadly, this attempted historical revision shows no signs of abating. In preparation for the next legislative session, a host of bills attacking voter access have been introduced in Pennsylvania. Among these are cherry-picked identification requirements for mail ballots, standards for signature matching based on pseudoscience and an attempt to wipe out the ability to vote absentee without an excuse

Rather than attacking nonpartisan election officials and voters, these politicians should remember and embrace their accountability to the public, remove barriers to the ballot, make voting more fair and easy by increasing funding for early voting sites and drop boxes in every county, and to provide paid postage for mail-in ballots.

Recently, sixty-three Pennsylvania lawmakers sent a letter to the state’s congressional delegation asking it to invalidate Pennsylvania’s electoral votes. The missive amounts to an attack on the integrity of election officials, lodged simply because voters didn’t choose the outcome that these politicians wanted at the ballot box. The letter contains zero evidence of a smoking gun, but plenty of sour grapes.

But it is not only an attack on election officials who are doing their job to help voters, regardless of their political affiliation — it is also an attack on every voter who braved a pandemic to make their voice heard.

Ultimately, it is an attack on democracy itself in service of dangerous extremism. 

This behavior from politicians is unacceptable. It comes on the heels of a wave of death threats to election officials last month. Election officials, like politicians, are accountable to voters first. Politicians knowingly have put the lives of the people responsible for counting our votes at risk.

Unfortunately, elected officials’ anger at being held accountable hasn’t ended with these attacks, or even with the dozens of baseless and error-filled lawsuits aimed at overturning the results of the election. Everything but the kitchen sink has been thrown at courts and election officials in an attempt to get them to stymie the will of the voters.

Politicians must reject such cynical attacks and work to remove barriers to the ballot that are installed to suppress and manipulate who can vote. It’s time that politicians work with election officials, not against them. We need the politicians and officials who work for us to pass laws to make voting more secure, fair, and accessible. They should keep up with quickly moving technology and provide clarity on the policies, processes and procedures that voters follow to exercise their rights.

Lawmakers should expand the success of Act 77, which made it possible for millions of Pennsylvanians to vote by mail. Pennsylvania’s legislature must pass a pre-canvass policy that would put the Commonwealth in line with numerous states run by legislatures and governors across the political spectrum and allow for processing and scanning of mail-in ballots for 30 days leading up to Election Day. This would shorten the time it takes to count votes and relay accurate results, and it would save tax dollars by reducing overtime from long hours processing at the last minute.

It’s long past time for politicians to respect the results of our fair and free election. Voters have made their voice clearly heard, and election officials worked hard in unprecedented conditions to do so. Now, let’s make sure politicians remember who it is they work for, and listen to the voters.

 


Scott Seeborg is the Pennsylvania state director for All Voting is Local.

Latest Cafe

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for daled daled says:

    “Extremists” (or the billionaires that benefit) have the money. Enough said?

  2. Avatar for caltg caltg says:

    Unfortunately, most RethugliCons have learned from Trump that all of politics is transactional. “If I spend money – lots and lots of other people’s money – running for election, I deserve to win, . . . . no matter how the votes are counted. Votes not cast for me should not even be counted.” That is the Rethuglican “Golden Rule.” Like in the Gilded Age, all elections are bought.

  3. The extremists are in control of the Trumpist party (it can no longer be called the Republican party) because there are a lot of unelected billionaire extremists who have money and control of large hunks of American media but have never bought into the idea of democracy.

  4. Avatar for zandru zandru says:

    Oh, sure. Making sure every eligible citizen can vote, and making voting easier sound all good and even constitutional. But what if your party’s ideology only appeals to a (shrinking) minority? Do you go with this “democracy” cr** – or go for the win?

    Remember, our 1700s-vintage Constitution is designed to allow for minority rule. The Electoral College/Rube Goldburg mechanism for electing the one national office; the Senate; legislative districts… A party willing to exploit these features-not-bugs can continue to run the country and the states with a constantly diminishing minority of the votes. And once the takeover is complete, it will take greater and greater supermajorities for states and the federal government to dig out.

    We may be past that point.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

2 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for daled Avatar for zandru Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for caltg Avatar for hahagoodman Avatar for geographyjones

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: