It’s Time For Congress To Lead By Example. It’s Time For Remote Voting.

We are writing as former Hill staffers. We know what happens on the floor is important. And yet, we believe the time has come for remote voting. In this time of pandemic, Congress should temporarily change the rules to allow for remote voting.
WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 23: U.S. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) answers a question from a reporter while walking to the House chamber at the start of a vote on the latest stimulus package April 23, 2020 in W... WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 23: U.S. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) answers a question from a reporter while walking to the House chamber at the start of a vote on the latest stimulus package April 23, 2020 in Washington, DC. The House of Representatives is expected to pass a $484 billion aid package during the vote. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

This article is part of TPM Cafe, TPM’s home for opinion and news analysis. 

Last week, members of the House gathered in Washington to cast their votes on the stopgap coronavirus relief funding bill. That move put them, their staff, the airline and airport employees with whom they interacted, and their families at greater risk of contracting the deadly coronavirus — all because Congress doesn’t have remote voting. The House was reportedly also supposed to decide whether to allow proxy voting, but following Republican objections, members decided to create a committee to study the problem instead. At the moment, there’s a cloud of uncertainty hanging over when or how Congress will vote next: plans to return to Washington next week were scuttled by House leadership, under the advice of the House physician.

With an economy in freefall and more people falling sick every day, it’s clear that our Congress must do much more to solve the worst crisis of our lifetimes. It is equally clear that neither congregating in Washington during a pandemic, nor passing significant legislation without debate, is in the long-term interest of our democracy. That’s why Congress must immediately pass temporary remote voting. There is no time to waste.

We are writing as former Hill staffers. We’ve stood on the House and Senate floor when important decisions were made, watched members deliberate over votes and exchange critical pieces of information. We’ve even seen more than a few members discreetly change their votes when they realized they had voted the wrong way.

A few weeks ago, 70 House Democrats sent a letter to leadership calling for remote voting. Last week, House leadership expressed support for some form of remote or proxy voting. Most people who hear about this debate probably think, why is this such a big deal? Do it already. It’s just a vote.

But it’s not just a vote. What happens on the floor is much more than that. It’s serious, reasoned and urgent discussion about important issues that members need to resolve before they vote on a bill. It’s persuasion as members convince one another of the power of a particular approach. And often, it’s education, as members ask their colleagues or staff for advice to help them vote the right way.

We know what happens on the floor is important. And yet, we believe the time has come for remote voting. In this time of pandemic, Congress should temporarily change the rules to allow for remote voting.

The House and Senate have critical work to do in the coming months. If they adjourn sooner, they risk leaving millions of Americans in the lurch. The full human cost of this pandemic, in lives lost, jobs lost, and industries decimated, won’t be known for quite some time.

We need Congress hard at work to repair the damage. But every time members convene in Washington, they put themselves at risk, their staff at risk, people they interact with in airports and taxis at risk, and the national security at risk. The floor is a frenzy of activity. Forget about six feet of social distance. The place is jam-packed, as are committee rooms, congressional offices, the hallways, and the elevators.

Already, the number of members of Congress who have either tested positive or entered into quarantine is closing in on 50. And staff have tested positive too. With 147 members of the House of Representatives and 48 members of the Senate over 65, Congress is clearly in the age group most vulnerable to falling seriously ill and dying from the novel coronavirus. We cannot let that happen. If Congress is taken down by the coronavirus en masse, we will have a national security crisis of epic proportions on our hands. And with elections in many states postponed for the near future, we won’t be able to replace them anytime soon.

We need Congress now more than ever to provide critically needed supplies, safety and health protections for our first responders, as well as economic relief to the millions of families who are now at risk of losing everything — their jobs, their homes, their futures — through no fault of their own. We need our Congress paying close attention as this crisis unfolds, and developing solutions at the scale of the problem.

The only way that Congress can safely do its job right now is by protecting itself. It’s time for Congress to lead by example and do what is being asked of many of us. Stay home. Work from home. Vote from home.


Liz Watson is Executive Director of the Congressional Progressive Caucus Center, and a former member of the professional staff for the U.S. House Education and Labor Committee.

Joe Cirincione is President of the Ploughshares Fund, and a former member of the professional staff for the U.S. House Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Government Operations.

Leah Greenberg is Co-Executive Director of Indivisible, and a former member of the personal staff in the Office of U.S. Congressman Tom Perriello.

Latest Cafe
23
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Great. We’d never see them again.

  2. Yes. Yes, they should LEAD. It has been proven in several states that it is workable, safe and secure. However, the fight won’t be against this…it will be political and the fact that people who vote by mail are overwhelmingly realists which are not the ones that vote Republican.

  3. They’re not talking about voting by mail, they’re talking about them voting from home on legislation.

  4. Dem leadership needs to figure out how to be more visible. Mostly for the health and safety of the country since someone needs to provide real leadership, but also for their political benefit. This would get a lot of attention, especially right out of the gate. An opportunity to show what Dem leadership is capable of.

  5. If I recall correctly, the Congress can ( and I think already has) made money available to the States for this, but not all States will use it for this purpose - think, as always, about blue v. red.

    Blue States will gladly do it because they’ve seen the facts that it works - to wit, Washington State and the entire of the military since the Civil War.

    Red States want nothing to do with it, because they lose their perceived control over the situation and SOCIALISM!!! VOTER FRAUD!!! blah, blah, blah.

    It’s fine by me. The fewer Red State voters I have to deal with, the more I like it.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

17 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for sysprog Avatar for trnc Avatar for becca656 Avatar for grandpajoe Avatar for pine Avatar for darrtown Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for not_so_fluffy Avatar for maximus Avatar for sbscott Avatar for Akimbo

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: