GOP Sens Having ‘Good Discussions’ With WH On Biden’s Infrastructure Plan, Wicker Says

Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS) listens to Gina Raimondo, nominee for Secretary of Commerce, testify remotely during her Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee confirmation hearing on January 26, 2021. (Phot... Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS) listens to Gina Raimondo, nominee for Secretary of Commerce, testify remotely during her Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee confirmation hearing on January 26, 2021. (Photo by TOM WILLIAMS/POOL/AFP via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS) on Monday praised the discussions he and several of his fellow GOP senators have been having with the White House on their watered-down counterproposal to President Joe Biden’s multi-trillion dollar infrastructure plan.

“It has been on a less-formal basis. But they’re good discussions,” Wicker told Axios. “The details are being filled in. I think they’re open to talking about and understanding what our proposal is and how we got to where we got.”

Top White House officials like chief of staff Ron Klain and legislative affairs director Louisa Terrell have been meeting with the Republican senators in person or over the phone, according to Axios.

Biden is expected to unveil his sweeping $1.8 trillion proposal on Wednesday. With a skimpy price tag of $568 billion, the Republicans’ counteroffer to the plan falls well short of the President’s push to expand “human infrastructure” in areas like child care and free community college.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. A recent “good discussion” …

    R’s: “Why are you destroying us with all of these popular ideas?”

    WH: “Consequences, bitches.”

  2. Biden is expected to unveil his sweeping $1.8 trillion proposal on Wednesday.

    Let’s hear from Senator Wicker after that.

  3. There are lay-people Republicans who like Biden’s Infrastructure Plan.
    That’s an objective reality

  4. Let’s not and say we did. Another bad faith argument we don’t need.

  5. Uh huh…you offer 5% of what we NEED and that’s fraudulent after you whittle away the ‘overhead’ the GOP insists on…are these more ‘good discussions’ that waste time and then you walk away from? Whining and sniveling about ‘bipartisanship’ and running to the microphones crying about ‘fairness’???

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

58 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for paulw Avatar for jw1 Avatar for meri Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for cervantes Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for jimtoday Avatar for digitusmedius Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for arrendis Avatar for tao Avatar for dangoodbar Avatar for schmed Avatar for darrtown Avatar for zlohcuc Avatar for southerndem Avatar for tsp Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for katscherger Avatar for agnesbee Avatar for greenman66 Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for josep

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: