SCOTUS Shoots Down GOP Bid To Disrupt PA Election Results

CAPITOL HILL, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2013/06/01: Supreme Court Building, eastern facade. (Photo by John Greim/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Supreme Court Building, eastern facade. (Photo by John Greim/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The U.S. Supreme Court, with no noted dissents, turned down a request by Republicans in Pennsylvania seeking to muck up Joe Biden’s win in the state.

The case was brought by Republicans, including a member of the U.S. House re-elected this year and GOP House candidates who lost their races. They had argued that the 2019 law that expanded mail-in voting in Pennsylvania violated the state’s constitution. They had sought the U.S. Supreme Court’s intervention after the state Supreme Court rejected their lawsuit.

The justices’ refusal to get involved was the latest in an unrelenting string of defeats allies of the President have faced in court in their flailing quest to stave off his defeat.

Very few of those efforts have made it to the Supreme Court, and Tuesday’s rejection of the Pennsylvania lawsuit is latest sign that it has no interest in disturbing the election results.

Earlier Tuesday afternoon, the President retweeted an image of Justice Amy Coney Barrett with laser-beams coming out of her eyes. Trump pushed to get Barrett on the court before the election in part because he believed she could serve as a decisive vote in any post-election disputes. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) had offered to argue the Pennsylvania case before the Supreme Court.

The court’s order denying the Republicans’ request that it get involve was issued less than an hour after the Republicans’ last round of briefing hit the docket.

Latest News
393
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. The U.S. Supreme Court, with no noted dissents, turned down a request by Republicans in Pennsylvania seeking to muck up Joe Biden’s win in the state.

    Yay. Now about those Texas republicans seeking to intervene in the PA elections…

  2. This one makes them 1-50, a nice round number. Maybe we can get to 52, so DC and PR don’t feel left out?

  3. Over no public dissents, #SCOTUS rejects @MikeKellyPA’s emergency application to enjoin Pennsylvania from certifying its electors.

    This is as strong a message as the Court could *possibly* send that it’s not stepping into the election — and that all of this nonsense is over. pic.twitter.com/KuMXyOWQPS

    — Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) December 8, 2020
  4. Avatar for erik_t erik_t says:

    Welcome to the Deep State, Alito and ACB. lol.

  5. Avatar for grack grack says:

    How about 270? Or 306?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

387 more replies

Participants

Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for jw1 Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for cervantes Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for irasdad Avatar for inversion Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for lastroth Avatar for tena Avatar for jinnj Avatar for docd Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for tmulcaire Avatar for grack Avatar for kelaine Avatar for skeptical Avatar for agnesbee Avatar for timorwig Avatar for rucleare Avatar for dogselfie Avatar for kovie Avatar for Volvo_Birkenstock Avatar for Ethics_Gradient

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: