I’m trying to put together a Herman Cain harassment timeline. This is a work in progress because I’m having a hard time keep track of it all. So bear with me.

1. Politico allegations are false. Story is crap.

2. Yes, there were allegations. But they were false.

3. Yes there were allegations that were false and I don’t know what money was paid.

4. I don’t know whether money was paid. And it would be wrong for me to find out whether money was paid because it’s confidential.

5. There was a in-depth investigation. And I was cleared. But I don’t know anything about it.

6. Here’s the gesture that led to my getting accused of harassment.

7. Okay, I remember some discussion of a settlement number.

This baby is enough of a moving target I think we need to crowd source it. Which parts am I missing?

The Herman Cain rhetorical style works better with ‘999’ than explaining sexual harassment allegations.

Herman Cain describes gesture that led to harassment charge.

World replies: please don’t!

We thought it sounded a little odd that the CEO of a trade association wouldn’t know if a payout had been made to someone who accused him of sexual harassment. We asked an expert on sexual harassment law. And she doesn’t think it’s credible either.