WSJ: National Security Council Asked Pentagon For Iran Strike Options Last Year

US National Security Advisor John Bolton speaks about the administration's African policy at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, DC, on December 13, 2018. - The United States will seek an end to UN peacekeeping m... US National Security Advisor John Bolton speaks about the administration's African policy at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, DC, on December 13, 2018. - The United States will seek an end to UN peacekeeping missions in Africa that do not bring long-term peace, Bolton said Thursday. (Photo by NICHOLAS KAMM / AFP) (Photo credit should read NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

President Donald Trump’s National Security Council, led by National Security Adviser John Bolton, asked the Pentagon to develop options for a military strike against Iran last year, The Wall Street Journal reported Sunday citing unnamed current and former U.S. officials.

The request alarmed the Pentagon and State Department, the Journal reported, but the Pentagon complied with the request and developed the options. The Journal reported that it wasn’t clear whether Trump knew about, or was provided with, the plans for potential military strikes.

An unnamed “former senior U.S. administration official” said the request “definitely rattled people.”

“People were shocked,” the official added. “It was mind-boggling how cavalier they were about hitting Iran.”

The request came after militants, reportedly backed by Iran, fired rockets toward the U.S. consulate in Basra and the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad’s diplomatic green zone in September. The attacks did not cause any American injuries or major damage. 

“Over the past few days, we have seen life-threatening attacks in Iraq, including on the United States consulate in Basra and against the American embassy compound in Baghdad,” the White House said in a statement at the time. “Iran did not act to stop these attacks by its proxies in Iraq, which it has supported with funding, training, and weapons.”

The statement added: “The United States will hold the regime in Tehran accountable for any attack that results in injury to our personnel or damage to United States Government facilities.”

Bolton, well-known for his past cries to attack Iran, has made clear to other administration officials “that he personally supports regime change in Iran,” the Journal reported.

The NSC did not deny the Journal’s reporting in a statement for the article.

“We continue to review the status of our personnel following attempted attacks on our embassy in Baghdad and our Basra consulate, and we will consider a full range of options to preserve their safety and our interests,” a spokesperson for the NSC said.

Latest News
63
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. They’ll dust off the plans roughly 15 minutes after the Mueller report drops…

  2. Bolton gonna Bolton, but Putin said nyet.

  3. Just what America needs: Another goddamn war.
    WINNING!!!

  4. BTW, for anyone thinking military action vs. Iran is a good idea, just remember that the temperature of the ongoing insurgencies in Iraq and Afghanistan is largely controlled by Iran. Not the ISIS stuff, just the regular organic Yankee-go-home kind.

  5. Hard to tell who’s hand is further up Donnie’s Ass.

    Putin,
    Bibby, or
    MBS

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

57 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for horrido Avatar for tetrisd Avatar for moreyampersand Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for darrtown Avatar for tena Avatar for georgemilquetoast Avatar for southerndem Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for tsp Avatar for bodie1 Avatar for caltg Avatar for khyber900 Avatar for swell Avatar for j_publicus Avatar for cub_calloway Avatar for maximus Avatar for drtv Avatar for occamscoin

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: