White House Counsel: Boehner Lawsuit Will Be Quickly Thrown Out

FILE - This July 11, 2007, file photo shows attorney Neil Eggleston on Capitol Hill in Washington. Instead of easing towards the comfortable, eight-figure nest egg retirement he built on the high-stakes representati... FILE - This July 11, 2007, file photo shows attorney Neil Eggleston on Capitol Hill in Washington. Instead of easing towards the comfortable, eight-figure nest egg retirement he built on the high-stakes representation of prominent Washington corporate clients and officials, Eggleston is returning to a grueling job, that of chief counsel to a White House under siege on many fronts. President Barack Obama faces multiple congressional investigations, the promise of even more if Republicans take control of the Senate, and pushback from the Supreme Court. Add to that the latest challenge, House Speaker John Boehner’s threat of a lawsuit accusing the president of failing to carrying out laws passed by Congress. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — Lawyer Neil Eggleston could be looking toward a comfortable retirement on the generous nest egg he built through high-stakes representation of prominent Washington officials and corporate clients. Instead, he’s returning to a grueling post at a White House under siege on multiple legal fronts.

The 61-year-old Eggleston has come on as chief counsel as President Barack Obama faces congressional investigations, pushback from the Supreme Court, and House Speaker John Boehner’s announcement last month that he intends to sue the president over his stepped-up use of executive orders.

Among the myriad sensitive matters requiring Eggleston’s expertise, Boehner’s suit is an unexpected challenge he must prepare for without knowing exactly the legal arguments it will make. In his first interview since coming to the White House this spring, Eggleston predicted the matter will be quickly dismissed by a judge for a lack of legal standing.

“As I used to tell clients in private practice, anybody can sue anybody over anything,” Eggleston told The Associated Press from his West Wing corner office. “The fact that he’s going to say that he’s going to bring some lawsuit is not going to affect what the president is going to do.”

Eggleston’s guidance of the legal limits of Obama’s executive actions draws from experience working across all three branches of government early in his career. He clerked for Chief Justice Warren Burger, a conservative chosen by President Richard Nixon, and later worked for the House Select Committee investigating the Iran-Contra affair. He was in President Bill Clinton’s counsel’s office during oversight hearings into the Whitewater real estate transactions and later helped fight subpoenas of presidential aides in the Monica Lewinsky investigation.

In private practice, he represented white-collar clients, including the outside directors at Enron after the company’s financial collapse. His political clients included Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel as a witness in the corruption trial of former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich. He also represented former Cabinet secretaries Federico Pena and Alexis Herman when they were facing investigations that did not result in charges.

Sara Taylor Fagen, President George W. Bush’s former political director, hired Eggleston when she was subpoenaed in a congressional investigation into White House involvement in the firings of U.S. attorneys. The White House advised her not to testify, but Eggleston escorted her to Capitol Hill and sat by, telling her which questions she could answer without violating Bush’s claims of executive privilege.

“He completely led the White House counsel out of a tricky situation when it should have been the other way around,” Fagen said.

Obama didn’t know Eggleston until outgoing counsel Kathy Ruemmler recommended him as her replacement. After he was chosen, she arranged a Camp David retreat for administration lawyers to get to know Eggleston. She “played Charlie Rose,” interviewing him before the group about growing up the son of a lawyer in Indiana, his experiences with Clinton and his management style.

Eggleston advises Obama on diplomatic policy, congressional investigations and judicial nominations, including preparation for a possible Supreme Court vacancy. He’s also a national security adviser on issues such as counterterrorism operations, like the capture of terrorism suspect Ahmed Abu Khattala, and the fallout of government surveillance disclosures by whistleblower Edward Snowden.

Eggleston’s financial disclosure report shows he has assets worth between $15 million and $43 million. He says part of how he’s built that wealth is that he is not much of a spender — he has one home in Chevy Chase, Maryland, and drives an 8-year-old car. He paid college tuition only for his daughter, a member of the Teach For America corps in Rhode Island, while his son is attending Eggleston’s alma mater, Duke University, on a soccer scholarship. He traveled to Tuscany last year as part of a cycling group he helps organize, but his other summer trips have been to the more modest destinations of Vermont and Iowa.

Eggleston said he has no qualms about coming back into government service amid so many challenges.

“To me, that’s even better,” he said with a smile.

___

Follow Nedra Pickler at http://twitter.com/nedrapickler

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News
21
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. This article feels much more like something out of Tiger Beat than the headline would lead you to believe. This is something I’m seeing more and more out of TPM. When I see a headline that looks like a substantive story, I expect a substantive story. I don’t mind the fluff pieces, I know you need to keep grist in the millstones, but could you title them appropriately?

  2. Boner is just trying to keep the attention of the TP rabble in his caucus.

  3. I agree with CrackerJack. It seems like this is happening more often, a flashy headline and very little substance. Even sometimes the same story with a new headline. I like TPM enough to even subscribe but could do without misleading headlines.

  4. Avatar for mymy mymy says:

    The suit is ridiculous on its face, without any real substance. (After all, they couldn’t get a single person who was ‘lied to’ about keeping insurance to sue?? Besides, by any definition, this was no lie, since it was true of the original legislation that ‘grandfathered’ in those with sub-par plans for a time.)

    On the other hand, for Kapur to write that the WH is ‘under siege’ is really, really a stretch, isn’t it? So SCOTUS threw out ‘recess appointments’ made only when the Senate was in pro forma sessions. Not much to see there.

    The Hobby Lobby decision is so flawed and so motivated by male Catholic ideology that it will never be considered a serious standard, and it was even altered the next day with the Wheaton College decision.

    I know that the cons have been on Sunday shows yelling that Obama has been reversed 13 times at the Supreme Court. How many times were other presidential administrations reversed in the same time frame? This article seems with its ‘WH under siege’ blather to be partaking of the conservatives’ blather.

  5. "know that the cons have been on Sunday shows yelling that Obama has been reversed 13 times at the Supreme Court. "

    Well, all that shows is the Koch brothers got what they paid for when they bought the Republican Party. Remind them of that, that a bunch of intellectual prostitutes like the Conservative 5 will be laughed, ridiculed, and forcibly ejected from the books of our laws once real adults get around to erasing all of the childish right-wing graffiti that’s been scribbled on our nation’s legal framework.

    You cannot take people like Scalia seriously . . . his “decisions” have been 100% partisan, motivated by pure self-interest and greed. Cons can crow all they like. We’re going to smack them in their arrogant faces in November. Count on it.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

15 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for runfastandwin Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for ottis Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for mymy Avatar for leftflank Avatar for chammy Avatar for tallyjohnson Avatar for crackerjack Avatar for semiotix Avatar for ergospongebath Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for wrightwingnut Avatar for slippy Avatar for meta Avatar for tgoetz Avatar for 62fender

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: