Upon Investigation, Seems Twitter Isn’t Following Its Own Rules With Alex Jones

Radio host Alex Jones discusses Sen. Rand Paul's views on vaccination in a video uploaded to YouTube Feb. 3, 2015.
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Breaking with other companies like Facebook and YouTube, Twitter has refused to remove Alex Jones and InfoWars from its platform, saying that the posts do not violate Twitter’s rules.

However, upon closer inspection, many of the posts do seem flagrantly in violation of Twitter’s user rules, as they include Jones’ denigrating people on the basis of their gender or religion, as well as episodes of him harassing or encouraging violence against them, according to a Thursday CNN report.

What’s more, Twitter’s vice president for trust and safety Del Harvey reportedly said in an internal email that if Jones had demonstrated some of the behavior on Twitter that he had on Facebook and YouTube, he would definitely have been booted. However, CNN found that all the content that prompted the other companies to ban Jones was also posted to Twitter.

Twitter’s policy spells out that: “You may not engage in the targeted harassment of someone, or incite other people to do so. We consider abusive behavior an attempt to harass, intimidate, or silence someone else’s voice.” It also bans “hateful conduct” “on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or serious disease.”

On Twitter, Jones and his media company’s tweets calling Parkland shooting survivor David Hogg a Nazi, asserting that homosexuality and pedophilia are connected and threatening to “destroy” drag queens, among many other things, would seem to be in clear violation of those policies.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Twitter is between a rock and a hard place with Jones. If they ban Jones, they pretty much have to ban the Twittler in Chief. Tell me how the two users are different. You can’t. They haven’t banned or disciplined Twittler, so they really can’t say or do anything about Jones.

  2. I think there’s enough of a distance, however slight, between Dotard and Jones, for Twitter to ban Jones
    Twitter is much too valuable in documenting Dotard’s crimes and obstruction.

  3. Don’t they have an explicit exception for heads of state?

  4. However, upon closer inspection …

    … one learns pretty quickly never to expect moral behavior from corporations. It’s not why they exist.

  5. Which was written 7 November 2016 (I don’t actually know, just guessing)? What other head of State is allowed to get away with this nonsense?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

20 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for cervantes Avatar for theod Avatar for becca656 Avatar for sniffit Avatar for alyoshakaramazov1 Avatar for ottnott Avatar for pshah Avatar for clauscph Avatar for morrigan_2575 Avatar for fechelard Avatar for centralasiaexpat Avatar for maximus Avatar for georgial1beral Avatar for aiddon Avatar for guenterghoti Avatar for tomsrant Avatar for richiniowa

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: