DOJ Sues CA Over New Law Protecting Discarded Net Neutrality Rules

on September 25, 2018 in Washington, DC.
WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 25: U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions speaks about the opioid crisis during the National Institute of Justice Opioid Research Summit, at the Office of Justice Programs, on September 25, ... WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 25: U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions speaks about the opioid crisis during the National Institute of Justice Opioid Research Summit, at the Office of Justice Programs, on September 25, 2018 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the state of California on Sunday evening after Gov. Jerry Brown singed a new bill into law that enforces net neutrality rules that were abandoned by the Federal Communications Commission last year, Politico reported. 

The bill was passed by the California state legislature in August and has been rebuked by the FCC and some companies, like USTelecom, which owns AT&T and Verizon. The new law aims to protect internet safeguards implemented by the Obama administration, which were rolled back by the FCC last year.

“The Justice Department should not have to spend valuable time and resources to file this suit today, but we have a duty to defend the prerogatives of the federal government and protect our Constitutional order,” Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement Sunday. “We will do so with vigor. We are confident that we will prevail in this case —because the facts are on our side.”

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Again the repugs former belief in the supremacy of “states rights” goes swirling down the toilet bowl in the name of corporate profits.

  2. “USTelecom, which owns AT&T and Verizon.”

    Even in our current gilded age of antitrust enforcement, this is plainly and obviously untrue.

  3. This is a standard Supremacy Clause case. Sessions will win. The real issue is how can California develop the clout it needs in Congress when 7 rural western states have far more representation than Los Angeles.

  4. If there were a federal law forbidding net neutrality, you would be correct. There is no such law, so your assertion is mistaken.

  5. Thanks. Then it is Federal regulation vs. state law. Different question. Let’s see how it plays out.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

14 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for tigersharktoo Avatar for rollinnolan Avatar for alansnipes734 Avatar for sonsofares Avatar for tibetancowboy Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for ljb860 Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for enhancedthespian Avatar for loss_mentality Avatar for middleway Avatar for txlawyer

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: