Social Media Companies Say They Will Send Reps To Senate Hearing Next Week

FILE - This July 16, 2013, file photo shows a sign at Facebook headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif. Social media giant Facebook is expected to provide Congress on Monday, Oct. 2, 2017, with more than 3,000 ads that ran... FILE - This July 16, 2013, file photo shows a sign at Facebook headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif. Social media giant Facebook is expected to provide Congress on Monday, Oct. 2, 2017, with more than 3,000 ads that ran around the time of the 2016 presidential election and are linked to a Russian ad agency. (AP Photo/Ben Margot, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — Facebook, Twitter and Google say they will send representatives to a Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing next week on Russian meddling in the 2016 election.

The Oct. 31 hearing is the third scheduled with the social media companies as congressional investigators probe the spread of false news stories and propaganda online. The three companies are already scheduled to testify at Senate and House intelligence committee hearings on the same subject the next day, Nov. 1.

The Senate intelligence committee announced on Wednesday that each company will send its general counsel to testify. That’s Facebook’s Colin Stretch, Twitter’s Sean Edgett and Google’s Kent Walker. The companies have confirmed their attendance at the other two hearings but have not yet said who will appear.

All three committees are investigating the Russian interference and whether it is linked to President Donald Trump’s campaign. Facebook recently provided all of the committees with more than 3,000 ads they said were seen by an estimated 10 million people.

The ads, which Facebook said were traced to a Russian internet agency, focused on divisive political messages, including LGBT issues, immigration and gun rights.

Legislation proposed by Democratic Sens. Mark Warner of Virginia and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota would require social media companies to keep public files of election ads and meet the same disclaimer requirements as political broadcast and print advertising. Both Facebook and Twitter have said they will provide more information to the public about political ads, including who is funding them.

Federal regulations now require television and radio stations to make publicly available the details of political ads they air. That includes who runs the ad, when it runs and how much it costs.

___

Associated Press writers Ryan Nakashima in San Francisco and Barbara Ortutay in New York contributed to this report.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. These guys really make me miss the good old days of Compuserve and PeopleLink. AOL on a stretch. I never thought they might be a threat to the individual and the country.

  2. Even fake news has been off-shored. We should slap heavy excise taxes on this horseshit and penalties for abuse.

    At the rate of 1 million dollars per troll posting, we may actually come out ahead in this deal in the long run.

  3. Dear Senate: It’s not the ads, it’s the bots. If you want to do anything substantial (and the ads are an okay play to start), you need to convince them to alert users when a bot posts on their page, comments, is the source of data and where that bot originates from, including it’s routing path to the facebook (for example) servers.

    ETA: They’ll never get rid of bots, that fluffs their ad revenue, but they can at least be transparent about them.

  4. BUT , will they be let in ?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for leftflank Avatar for bojimbo26 Avatar for tomanjeri Avatar for justruss

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: