Scalise Doesn’t Object To Trump’s Talk Of Ordering End To Birthright Citizenship

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA) on Tuesday did not object to President Donald Trump’s proposal to use an executive order to eliminate birthright citizenship.

Birthright citizenship is constitutionally mandated by the 14th Amendment, and it would almost certainly take a constitutional amendment to change that, barring some extraordinary Supreme Court action. Still, asked about Trump’s assertion, Scalise told Fox News in an on-air interview that “the President is exploring the legal options to do this through executive action.”

Scalise also did not challenge Trump’s lie that the United States is the only country with birthright citizenship; dozens of countries do, including Canada and Mexico.

“I would like to see us get back to rule of law,” Scalise said, before referring to the migrants and asylum seekers traveling through Mexico on the way to the U.S. border.

The so-called “caravan” is weeks away from arriving, yet the Pentagon on Monday — days before the midterm elections — announced the deployment of thousands of troops to the border to greet what Trump has falsely called an “invasion.”

“I’m glad that the President is saying he’s going to use whatever means necessary,” Scalise said.

Earlier in the interview, Scalise said the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting, which left 11 Jews dead, was “an attack against Jewish people, it wasn’t, I don’t even think, about philosophy or political ideology.”

But, in addition to being an anti-Semitic attack, the alleged shooter, Robert Bowers, did express his political ideology online; he repeatedly expressed a hatred of Jews for their role welcoming refugees into the country.

Latest News
55
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Not "about philosophy or political ideology.”

    OMG

  2. “Birthright citizenship is constitutionally mandated by the 14th Amendment, and it would almost certainly take a constitutional amendment to change that, barring some extraordinary Supreme Court action.

    I think I see the problem right there…

  3. Remember that Steve Scalise was described early in his political career as “David Duke without the baggage.” That was intended as a compliment.

  4. Avatar for tena tena says:

    It’s not going anywhere - it’s in the constitution. You are not going to amend the constitution. You will be lucky if you don’t get indicted after the election but one thing I know - you aren’t going to do shit.

  5. I wonder how far back you have to go to find which one of Steve Scalise’s ancestors was granted birthright citizenship. Two generations? Three?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

49 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for tonnyb Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for mrdependable Avatar for nowarino Avatar for braxtonbraggart Avatar for commiedearest Avatar for losamigos Avatar for jimtoday Avatar for irasdad Avatar for nemo Avatar for tompoe Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for raincntry Avatar for tena Avatar for southerndem Avatar for greysea Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for centralasiaexpat Avatar for tompaine73 Avatar for msc00 Avatar for evave2 Avatar for foodified

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: