Obama Campaign Machine Revving Up To Elect Clinton

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., gives thumbs up as Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., speaks in Unity, N.H., Friday, June 27, 2008, during their first joint public appearance since the divisiv... Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., gives thumbs up as Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., speaks in Unity, N.H., Friday, June 27, 2008, during their first joint public appearance since the divisive Democratic primary race ended. To her backers Clinton said: "I know that he'll work for you. He'll fight for you, and he'll stand up for you every single day in the White House," calling Obama "a leader who invests in our future." (AP Photo/Alex Brandon) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — The vaunted data-driven machine that twice got President Barack Obama elected is revving up to help elect Hillary Clinton, as Democrats look to recreate the tactical advantage they used against Republicans in 2008 and 2012.

With Obama’s popularity rebounding, Democrats have been eagerly awaiting the president’s return to campaigning, and he’ll hold his debut event for her Tuesday in North Carolina. Yet campaign officials say just as critical to her success could be an Obama political operation that remains potent four years after his re-election, including deep troves of voter and donor information, and a corps of trained field staffers and volunteers that Clinton’s campaign is now co-opting.

The crown jewel of Obama’s machine, an email list of supporters that included 20 million addresses in 2012, is now fully available to Clinton. That list had been closely held within an Obama campaign committee that still exists to pay off old debt. Democratic groups and even Obama’s Organizing for Action nonprofit had to rent the list for a hefty sum.

Now a copy of that list, which helped propel Obama to record-breaking fundraising, is controlled by the Democratic National Committee, which can send emails at will without going through Obama’s campaign. That’s according to individuals familiar with the list, who weren’t authorized to discuss the arrangement and requested anonymity.

Just recently, the DNC started sending emails signed by Clinton to the entire list, including one last week inviting donors to enter a raffle to be Clinton’s guest to the Broadway musical “Hamilton.”

For Clinton supporters, the handover of the email list is the clearest indication that concerns that sprang up after Obama’s re-election have turned out unfounded. In 2013, when Obama declined to transfer the list to the national party, some Democrats griped that he was holding out on his party by sequestering his most coveted campaign resources.

Mitch Stewart, Obama’s battleground states director in 2012, said there was some disagreement that year about whether Obama’s tech-infused strategy would work for other Democrats, or whether the phenomenon was Obama-specific. He said the continuity between Obama’s campaign and Clinton’s was proving it can be sustained.

“The people involved in the Clinton campaign aren’t having to relearn the lessons in 2016 that we already learned in 2008 or 2012,” said Stewart, who since started a consulting firm that’s helping Clinton’s campaign. “A lot of them are the same people.”

Obama campaign veterans permeate Clinton’s operation at just about every level. Elan Kriegel, who ran data analytics for Obama, is doing the same job for Clinton, and Obama pollster Joel Benenson is now her chief strategist. At Clinton’s Brooklyn headquarters, her battleground states director, national organizing director, political engagement chief and communications director are all former Obama hands.

In the most competitive states that will help determine the winner, Clinton has hired former Obama aides to build out her operation for the general election. Her state directors in Ohio, Colorado, Iowa and Nevada all had experience on Obama’s campaigns.

For Clinton, the Obama imprimatur is particularly critical because of the election’s arithmetic, which suggests she’ll win the White House if she can carry the “Obama coalition” — young people, minorities and women — with similar numbers. Those groups haven’t always shown up for Democrats when Obama isn’t on the ballot, making their reliability an open question for Clinton.

That’s where Obama’s much-touted data operation comes in. After gathering troves of data in 2008 about donors and voters —for instance, which magazines they subscribe to, whether they like to vote early, how likely they are to open certain emails — the campaign in 2012 debuted the ability to merge all those factoids into one dataset that can triangulate how best to reach an individual voter. That data file now lives at the DNC, where it’s updated with new information from state elections agencies and commercial databases.

“The aspiration is to make it an inheritance, so that the campaign can spend its time working on the next incremental innovation and piece of infrastructure from a foundation of where the last campaign left off,” said Joe Rospars, who was Obama’s chief digital strategist in both campaigns and whose firm has done work for Clinton’s campaign.

But Lindsay Walters, a Republican National Committee spokeswoman, said Republicans are prepared to rival Clinton’s campaign with a data-intensive operation of their own. She said despite Obama’s help, Clinton’s poll numbers had proven that she’s been unable to match his appeal to millennials and black voters.

“To use his model is to tap into all those voters, and right now, she’s falling short,” Walters said.

The Obama-Clinton cross-pollination extends to the money race, where high-dollar Obama donors are contributing to Clinton in large numbers. Priorities USA, a super PAC set up by former Obama officials to support his re-election, was taken over by Clinton allies and repurposed to help her win the White House, and many of the same donors who funded the group in 2012 are returning with their checkbooks, including media moguls Haim Saban and Fred Eychaner, who have both given the group millions this year.

___

Associated Press writer Julie Bykowicz contributed to this report.

___

Reach Josh Lederman on Twitter at http://twitter.com/joshledermanAP. His work can be found at http://bigstory.ap.org/author/josh-lederman

Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. I’ll never understand why this machine wasn’t used in 2010 and 2014 to GOTV. 2010 was devastating.

    I know he conventional wisdom was that Obama would only hurt the cause, and in fairness to Obama, a lot of Democratic candidates didn’t want his help, but I still believe had he gone into full campaign mode, he could have reversed the slide.

  2. It was used, but nothing can beat gerrymandered districts and southern ignorance.

  3. The districts were gerrymandered AFTER the 2010 mid-terms thanks to the massive GOP gains in statehouses. The losses in 2010 was the cause of the gerrymandering.

    And you can’t gerrymander Senate seats.

  4. More or less it was…
    But in 2010 lots of people my age were “mad” and “betrayed” because Obama turned out to be human and not “Bagger Vance” I mean we voted for “hope and change” and we waited a whole 6 months and we didn’t get everything we wanted… What were we supposed to do? Be patient? So we were determined to “send a message” and the Tea Party was truly ascendant. didn’t help that Democratic voters were activly repudiating the “50-State Strategy” because the Blue Dogs it elected were, to purity minded Dems, “worse than Republicans”. So like usual we made the perfect the enemy of the good…

    In 2014 Dems were actively running away from Obama because… Again… Like usual we let Republican control the narrative with regards to The ACA and such. top it off with young people not turning up (look even in 2008 we didn’t show up in the numbers polling Indicated even though we turned up in record numbers) like usual because congressional elections are confusing and unsexy.

  5. The story mentioned that Obama isn’t on the ticket this year, but I’d say the other team is doing everything they can to put him on anyway and make it about him, the guy they lost twice to. Slow learners, I’ll tell you. Very slow learners. They never seemed to understand that he won twice by getting more votes by being popular as a person and political leader. They still think it’s a winning approach to describe him as a walking catalogue of every known human flaw. Slow, slow, slow, slow learners.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

90 more replies

Participants

Avatar for phoebes Avatar for cat Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for dwward Avatar for jw1 Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for lok52 Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for eggrollian Avatar for chammy Avatar for trumpdog Avatar for jimtoday Avatar for randyabraham Avatar for cvilledem Avatar for jinx_tpm Avatar for barblzz Avatar for emilianoelmexicano Avatar for tena Avatar for manziel Avatar for pandastirfry Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for erratum Avatar for centristdem Avatar for hahagoodman

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: