Dem Lawmaker Said He Will Protest Moment Of Silence On House Floor

Rep. Jim Himes, D-Conn., questions Deputy Attorney General James Cole; Chris Inglis, deputy director of the National Security Agency; Gen. Keith B. Alexander, director of the National Security Agency; Deputy Director... Rep. Jim Himes, D-Conn., questions Deputy Attorney General James Cole; Chris Inglis, deputy director of the National Security Agency; Gen. Keith B. Alexander, director of the National Security Agency; Deputy Director of the FBI Sean Joyce, and Robert Litt, general counsel to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence; as they appear before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence regarding NSA surveillance in Washington, Tuesday, June 18, 2013. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — A Democratic congressman frustrated with inaction on gun control said Monday he’s done with the moments of silence typically held on the House floor after mass shootings, calling them “obnoxious expressions of smug incompetence.”

Connecticut Rep. Jim Himes says he will leave the House floor when the chamber pauses to honor 49 people killed at an Orlando nightclub early Sunday morning. Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., has scheduled the observance for Monday evening.

Himes and other Democrats have complained about the moments of silence as Republicans and some Democrats have remained opposed to additional gun controls. The Democrat’s Connecticut district is close to Newtown, where a gunman killed 20 first-graders and six adults at an elementary school in 2012.

In a series of tweets Sunday, Himes said the silence doesn’t honor victims, but mocks them. He called the observances an “abomination” and said he will not be silent.

In an interview Monday, he said the moments are “obnoxious expressions of smug incompetence” and the perfect metaphor for inaction on guns in Congress. He said he plans to talk to Democratic colleagues about leaving the floor and honoring the victims in another way at the same time.

Himes said the point is not to be disruptive, but “to make the obvious moral point that silence in the face of death is not acceptable.”

He’s not the first Democrat to complain about the ritual. When a moment was held to honor victims of a deadly shooting rampage in San Bernardino, California, in December, several Democrats criticized it.

“We need to stand up, speak up, and take actions rather than another moment of silence,” said Rep. Robin Kelly, D-Ill., in a House floor speech at the time. “It is deafening, and it is killing us.”

Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News
37
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. And then what will you do?

  2. Avatar for yskov yskov says:

    I appreciate the sentiment but the optics here are terrible.

  3. I agree, but from a human perspective, aren’t we beyond optics?

  4. I disagree. He made the case perfectly. Being silent in the face of such a heinous act, refusing to do anything in Congress related to these reoccurring mass murders, failing to regulate assault weapons, all are an “obnoxious expressions of smug incompetence”. I wish this Representative well. His protest is not lost on many of us. I only wish he was my representative. He stands for something…wanting action, not silence…and repeated calls for “thoughts and prayers” isn’t gonna do it either. I want action too…not bullshit silence by people who pocket NRA money openly and then refuse to do anything amounting to common-sense to deal with these ongoing catastrophes. Moments of silence make a mockery of the dead, in light of their consistent inaction. The optics are nothing more than a sanctimonious lie made to make a bunch of lawmakers that sit on their hands, feel less guilty for doing absolutely nothing to change the situation.

  5. Avatar for yskov yskov says:

    As imkmu3 said, what he does instead or next, and who he does it with, is critical. Otherwise he’s spun as just another Un-Amurcan Leftist Democrat who obviously supports Radical Islamic Terrorism. and can’t get along with his colleagues anyway.

    Plenty of people are holding moments of silence. The thing is not to left that be the end of your action on this front.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

31 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for pokeyoakey Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for mikem42 Avatar for thismike Avatar for sniffit Avatar for yskov Avatar for sherlock1 Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for longtimeobserver Avatar for ignoreland Avatar for addicted4444 Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for hallam Avatar for bigdaddydrj Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for azjude Avatar for pshah Avatar for tena Avatar for meta Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for kc63 Avatar for jacksonhts

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: