Kobach: ‘High Possibility’ Commission Won’t Make Any Recommendations

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach and Vice Chairman of the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity attends the first meeting of the Commission at The White House in Washington, DC, July 19, 2017. C... Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach and Vice Chairman of the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity attends the first meeting of the Commission at The White House in Washington, DC, July 19, 2017. Credit: Chris Kleponis / CNP - NO WIRE SERVICE - Photo by: Chris Kleponis/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

MANCHESTER, N.H. (AP) — The vice chairman of President Donald Trump’s commission on election fraud on Tuesday dismissed criticism that the panel is bent on voter suppression, saying there is a “high possibility” it will make no recommendations when it finishes its work — and even if it does, it can’t force states to adopt them.

Trump, a Republican, created the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity in May to investigate his unsubstantiated claims that millions of people voted illegally in 2016. Democrats have blasted the commission as a biased panel determined to curtail voting rights, and they ramped up their criticism ahead of and during the group’s daylong meeting in New Hampshire.

California Secretary of State Alex Padilla, a Democrat, said some voters have canceled their registrations or been hesitant to register since learning the group has asked state governments to provide data on individual voters.

“Their voting suppression impact has already begun,” he said on a press call organized by the Democratic National Committee.

The commission in June requested any records considered public by states, including driver’s license numbers, partial Social Security numbers and voting histories. No state is sending all of the information sought, and 14 states are denying the commission’s request.

There was no mention of the data request during the commission’s meeting, which included presentations about historical election turnout data, electronic voting systems and issues affecting public confidence in elections. But speaking to reporters afterward, commission vice chairman Kris Kobach emphasized that states are only being asked to send already-public information and called the Democrats’ criticism about voter suppression “bizarre.”

“The claim goes something like this: The commission will meet, then they’ll recommend things like photo ID or some other election security measure, then the states will adopt them. There’s your leap in logic. The commission does not have the ability to do a Jedi mind trick on a state legislature and force them to adopt anything,” said Kobach, the Republican secretary of state in Kansas.

“All the commission is doing is collecting data,” he added. “It may make recommendations, or I think at this point there’s a high possibility the commission makes no recommendations and they just say, ‘Here’s the data. States, do with it what you want.'”

Privacy advocates have raised concerns about the information being collected in one central place, although the commission has said the detailed data will not be made public and will be destroyed when the commission is done with it.

Kobach said 20 states have sent data so far. He said the commission hopes to use it to investigate possible cases of people voting in multiple states but said that will depend on how much information it receives.

“It may be that the commission is not able to say we were able to look at all 50 states and here is the size of this particular problem,” he said.

Kobach also was admonished by fellow commission member and Democratic New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner after clarifying recent comments he made alleging voter fraud in New Hampshire.

Kobach last week wrote a column for the conservative site Breitbart claiming statistics on thousands of people who used out-of-state licenses to register to vote in New Hampshire amounted to proof that people enter the state from elsewhere specifically to cast fraudulent votes. Kobach had said “it appears” that’s why Democrat Maggie Hassan won her U.S. Senate seat in November.

“I’m still wondering if that was the right word to use,” he said Tuesday, acknowledging that New Hampshire allows college students, military personnel and others to vote in the state without becoming residents and getting driver’s licenses if they consider the state their domicile.

“Until further research is done … we will never know the answer regarding the legitimacy of that particular election,” Kobach said.

Gardner, who has resisted calls for him to leave the commission over Kobach’s comments, said the Senate race results were “real and valid” and reminded Kobach to stay on task.

“In the first couple of meetings we had, the chairman of the commission made it very clear to me … we work in a way that we don’t have preconceived or preordained ideas about what the facts are going to be,” he said. “We’re going to search for the truth. That is something we need to all stay focused on.”

Another commission member, Democratic Maine Secretary of State Matthew Dunlap, was more pointed, calling Kobach’s comments “reckless.”

“There’s utterly no connectivity between motor vehicle law and election law. Primarily, you have a right to vote. Driving is a privilege,” he said. “Making this equation that somehow people not updating their driver’s licenses is indicative of voter fraud would be almost as absurd as saying if you have cash in your wallet that’s proof that you robbed a bank.”

Latest News
42
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Well, I’ve got a few for you.

  2. Avatar for zsak zsak says:

    What? No sense of humor? Doesn’t want to be laughed at?

  3. Nobody knew that voter suppression could be so hard for a presidential commission. I guess it’s back to the old way - Republican state legislatures passing unconstitutional laws, and the Sessions DOJ refusing to challenge them.

  4. The sole purpose of this kangaroo kommission is to cast doubt on the integrity of our election results. They have no expectation of learning anything. They have no expectation of generating legislation. They don’t need to stick to provable facts, their single function is to allow Trump to continue with his lie that he really won the popular vote, if only all of those “other” people hadn’t voted illegally.

  5. Well , after spending all that money , they only had to ask the Russian hackers for the evidence .

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

36 more replies

Participants

Avatar for paulw Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for kwoodgr Avatar for sysprog Avatar for jloomis3 Avatar for jep07 Avatar for clemmers Avatar for bojimbo26 Avatar for economides Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for sniffit Avatar for lastroth Avatar for mike_in_houston Avatar for tao Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for benthere Avatar for thermos_hildebrand Avatar for gajake Avatar for rickjones Avatar for beelzabubba Avatar for rgcincy Avatar for zsak Avatar for qwerty23 Avatar for greenman66

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: