Hillary Clinton Calls Obama Immigration Effort A ‘Historic Step’

Hillary Rodham Clinton, former US Secretary of State, speaks during her keynote remarks at the Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves summit, Friday Nov. 21, 2014 in New York. (AP Photo/Bebeto Matthews)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

NEW YORK (AP) — Hillary Rodham Clinton says she supports President Barack Obama’s executive actions to protect about 5 million immigrants living in the U.S. illegally, calling it a “historic step” and urging Congress to pursue a measure approved by the Senate last year.

Clinton placed the efforts aimed at changing immigration policy in the context of
families, many of whom she said are longtime residents raising children and paying taxes.

“This is about people’s lives,” she said Friday during an appearance at the New York Historical Society, adding that it was about “people who serve us tonight, who prepared the food tonight.”

Clinton is considering a presidential campaign in 2016 and her embrace of Obama’s actions come in sharp contrast to Republican condemnation of the changes the president has ordered.

“I think the president took an historic step and I support it,” the former secretary of state said in her first public comments on the issue. She had issued a statement shortly after Obama’s speech Thursday night expressing support.

Obama’s actions were in line with previous moves by Democratic and Republican
presidents alike, she said. However, many Republicans in Congress accuse Obama of overstepping his executive powers.

Charging hypocrisy, the Republican National Committee released a Web video earlier in the day that included the audio of an April 2008 Clinton speech in which she criticized President George W. Bush’s use of signing statements and other means “to transform the executive into an imperial presidency.”

Clinton spoke about the immigration plan during an interview with Walter Isaacson, the biographer and CEO of the Aspen Institute, at the event. She said she was studying the life and presidency of Theodore Roosevelt and discussed the need for Americans to find a “common purpose.”

“I think we just need to get back into that can-do, problem-solving spirit that the Roosevelts exemplified,” she said.

The former first lady jumped back into the political conversation as dozens of her staunchest allies gathered at a New York hotel earlier Friday — even though she has yet to say whether she will run.

Ready for Hillary, a Democratic super PAC unaffiliated with Clinton, convened the
meeting of 200 financial backers and Clinton insiders to prepare for a campaign.

“It was a leap of faith,” Harold Ickes, who worked in Bill Clinton’s White House, said of the Ready for Hillary effort. “We didn’t know if people would come to us, but we now have 3 million names, which will be important to her if she runs.”

Clinton sits far atop a hypothetical field of Democratic candidates that is beginning to take shape.

Vice President Joe Biden and outgoing Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley are potential challengers to Clinton, as is former Virginia Sen. Jim Webb, who has opened an exploratory committee.

Discussions at the session included lessons learned from the 2014 election, the media
landscape and what the 2016 campaign might look like.

Attendees said they had no inside knowledge on when Clinton would make her decision. But they said the early organizing on her behalf would facilitate the transition from private citizen to candidate. Ready for Hillary has identified 3 million supporters and raised more than $10 million.

“It’s given her the luxury of time,” said Jerry Crawford, an Iowa attorney.

They cautioned against the notion that Clinton would have a big advantage because of her existing network from her husband’s two terms and her own political operation. “She’s not inevitable,” said Adam Parkhomenko, Ready for Hillary’s executive director. “It’s not going to be easy.”

The ballroom included leaders of Democratic groups Priorities USA Action, American Bridge 21st Century and Correct the Record.

___

Follow Ken Thomas on Twitter: http://twitter.com/KThomasDC

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights
reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or
redistributed.

Latest News
10
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. please go away and take your husband with you. haven’t the Clintons and their cronies done enough to ruin the middleclass

  2. I was searching for legal opinions on Jonathan Turley’s chances of being granted standing for Boehner’s lawsuit and found this article by Jack Goldsmith…

    It is important to note that most Presidents in American history – and every single great one – have deployed executive power in unprecedentedly aggressive ways, and were accused of being dictatorial. Clinton Rossiter correctly noted that if a president is not “widely and persistently accused in his own time of ‘subverting the Constitution,’ he may as well forget about being judged a truly eminent man by future generations.” Rossiter was not saying that lawlessness is a guarantee of greatness. But the legal line between presidential and congressional powers is often broad and fuzzy, and presidents often must act within the fuzzy area (and sometimes beyond it) to achieve the great and important goals that they believe they are charged with by virtue of elections and the office of the presidency.

  3. What do I think of Obama’s so called action on immigration? BLAH!!!

    It’s nothing but a political move to bring Hispanics to the fold. It does nothing for people who came to the country legally, overstayed their visas, have families here (maybe not children - not everyone wants to have 5 and 6 kids), work hard and not living off the government.

    It’s an outrage, everyone should have been given a chance.

  4. You clearly have no clue as to what the EO entails, and who is affected by it.

    Or perhaps you take particular delight in exposing your lack of knowledge publicly.

  5. Avatar for marv marv says:

    I also wish a magic bean could bring relief to ALL immigrants, but, an all or nothing approach often yields less results than one of do all you can, when you can. It is certainly not true that this action did nothing for those not included. We were very much at a point of "all things immigration are now dead until at least 2017. " In the last couple of days, political discussion has been all immigration all the time. Even a lot of Republicans are already focused on how can we get in on some of this immigration feel good stuff?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

4 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for doremus_jessup Avatar for marv Avatar for opinionated1 Avatar for Dawn_Rainbow Avatar for lamonth Avatar for just2stressed Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for omahhum

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher & Digital Producer:
Senior Developer:
Senior Designer: