Gowdy Asks Zinke To Explain $139K Project To Upgrade Interior’s Doors

on March 13, 2018 in Washington, DC.
WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 13: Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke testifies before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee March 13, 2018 in Washington, DC. Zinke testified on the proposed FY2019 budget for the Int... WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 13: Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke testifies before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee March 13, 2018 in Washington, DC. Zinke testified on the proposed FY2019 budget for the Interior Department. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — The chairman of the House Oversight Committee is seeking details from Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke about a $139,000 project to upgrade doors in Zinke’s office.

Oversight Chairman Trey Gowdy of South Carolina asked Zinke to explain the need for the replacement doors and provide details about the project’s cost estimates, bids and final contract.

The letter from the Republican chairman comes after The Associated Press reported earlier this month that Interior is spending nearly $139,000 to upgrade double doors in Zinke’s sixth-floor office overlooking the Washington Monument.

Zinke told the House Natural Resources Committee last week he has negotiated a significantly lower price for the project by “manipulating” contract terms. He did not elaborate.

An Interior spokeswoman said Friday that Zinke has directed changes in the project’s scope to save money. The new estimate is about 50 percent lower than the initial amount, spokeswoman Heather Swift said.

Swift said earlier this month that Zinke wasn’t aware of the contract until AP asked about it.

The Interior Department’s Office of Facilities and Administrative Services has called the $139,000 cost “reasonable,” noting that the project includes the installation of two sets of custom-built double doors and door frames, as well as demolition of existing doorways. The contract also covers repairs to another set of double doors that lead from a hallway to the secretary’s office.

Zinke said regulations regarding the 82-year-old, historic building near the National Mall significantly increase the cost of the renovations.

In his letter to Zinke, Gowdy said he is aware of “allegations of excess cost” and asked the department to provide a detailed briefing on the project, including information on the bid process and contract award, along with receipts for related expenses. The briefing should be scheduled by April 6, he said.

The Environmental Working Group, a Washington-based advocacy group, hailed Gowdy’s inquiry.

“Welcome to the resistance, Chairman Gowdy,” said Ken Cook, the group’s president.

“Taxpayer dollars flow out of the offices of Zinke and EPA chief Scott Pruitt like water from a fire hose,” Cook said, citing costs for first-class travel and other luxuries.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. So is Zinke going to be as condescending to Gowdy as he was to the Congresswoman from Hawaii?

  2. Zinke told a House committee last week he has negotiated a significantly lower price for the project by “manipulating” contract terms. He did not elaborate.

    He cut his kickback by half?

  3. Zinke told a House committee last week he has negotiated a significantly lower price for the project by “manipulating” contract terms. He did not elaborate.

    Hooo Boy. The lawyer in me says “manipulating” doesn’t read well.

    Another complete asshole in charge of one this country’s federal departments. :grin:

  4. Damn, man! Is that the door Rose floated on after Titanic sank? You guys find its match or did you have to make a new one from scratch – and that’s why the cost seems a bit high?

  5. Avatar for paulw paulw says:

    The sad thing is that, from the staff description, this is one of the few expenditures that might be sorta kinda justified. (The story is that these are the exterior doors that go from the office to a building balcony, and that the current ones leak and soak the office floor. If that’s true, yeah, you got a government building with a historic facade, you got ongoing damage to the interior that will eventually cost piles more money to fix, so it will be expensive. And doing it cheaply would just be a complete waste of money.) Of course, the staff might well be reality-impaired.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

49 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for daveminnj Avatar for kwoodgr Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for bojimbo26 Avatar for sandyh Avatar for callmeeric Avatar for otterqueen Avatar for lastroth Avatar for ottnott Avatar for jeffrey Avatar for jasan Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for beattycat Avatar for misterneutron Avatar for tsp Avatar for jenbieds Avatar for calsteeler Avatar for katscherger Avatar for redhand Avatar for tgp Avatar for rascal_crone

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: