Fox News Was Alone In Its House Flip Prediction For Nearly An Hour. Why?

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Fox News was out on a limb alone Tuesday night after projecting that Democrats would win the House at around 9:30 p.m., nearly an hour before any other networks made the call.

According to a Politico report, this is due to their methodology. Fox News partnered with the Associated Press to shun exit polling in favor of voters’ surveys, coupled with AP’s race results.

Fox News political editor Chris Stirewalt appeared on the air just after 10 p.m., when the network was still an island, to explain the early call.

“We’re just that good,” Stirewalt said. “I don’t mean to brag but our Fox News voter analysis and what we are now starting to see as the House races count later and come in — remember in these House races, you don’t have the forecast that you do on the Senate level. It takes longer for them to catch up but you’re starting to see them catch up.”

“We said all along, look at that sixth district in Kentucky,” he continued, referring to Republican Andy Barr’s squeaker win over Democratic challenger Amy McGrath. “That was a good one to watch. The very fact that that race was as close as it was told us, and told me at least, that the Democrats were getting the numbers they need. They have no business doing so well in a district like that.”

Watch Stirewalt’s full explanation here:

Latest News
12
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for bdtex bdtex says:

    Makes sense to me.

  2. Prediction For Nearly An Hour. Why?

    Uuhhh
    They’re not a news organization?
    They don’t give a fuck ?
    They’re used to getting things wrong and wouldn’t have to retract it ?

  3. Or would have retracted it and acted like they didn’t, or were trying to get republicans scared and hope some folks would suddenly go out and vote?

  4. Is that so? I seem to remember folks saying the House would flip months ago. What FOX did was look at the initial results, see them consistent with those predictions and then stick their neck out ( safely ) and make their call. It was a rash, albeit safely rash act, and not one of superior political acumen.

  5. I think it was to stall voting going on in the west.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

6 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for bdtex Avatar for rfscalf Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for blandsten Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for lolly1128 Avatar for dickweed Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for maximus Avatar for libthinker Avatar for ohcomeonnow

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: