Florida Finds Backlog Of More Than 13,000 Untested Rape Kits

Florida Gov. Rick Scott speaks with the media, Tuesday, Nov. 3, 2015, in Jacksonville, Fla., after a brief meeting with Floridians who felt they were overcharged by hospitals for medical care. (Bob Self(/The Florida ... Florida Gov. Rick Scott speaks with the media, Tuesday, Nov. 3, 2015, in Jacksonville, Fla., after a brief meeting with Floridians who felt they were overcharged by hospitals for medical care. (Bob Self(/The Florida Times-Union via AP) MANDATORY CREDIT MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. (AP) — Florida has a backlog of more than 13,000 rape kits that have not been tested or submitted for processing, and managing them could cost the state tens of millions of dollars and take several years, according to a report released Monday.

The Florida Department of Law Enforcement conducted the $300,000 study on the number of untested kits and will present its findings to the Legislature.

Backlogs of untested rape kits have been an issue across the U.S. In September, federal officials said an estimated 70,000 rape kits sitting in laboratories and evidence collection rooms across the country would be tested with a combined $79 million in federal and New York City funds.

Of the 13,345 rape kits in Florida that have gone untested, authorities said in Monday’s report that 9,484 should have been submitted. The FDLE recommends testing all kits “in the interest of public safety.”

The most common reason the kits weren’t tested, the report says, was that the victim decided not to proceed with the investigation. That was the case in 41 percent of the untested kits. In 31 percent of the kits, the state attorney’s office declined to prosecute. Other reasons included a suspect’s guilty plea, a victim’s death, or a victim who declined to file a police report.

Clearing the backlog will take time and money. The report says any proposals to test the thousands of kits “are dependent upon additional funding for outsourcing, technology, overtime and a stabilized workforce of crime laboratory analysts.”

Gov. Rick Scott announced in November that he will seek $8.5 million to help process the backlog. But estimates of managing the backlog range from about $9 million to $32 million over three to nine years, according to the report.

Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement that she’s pleased the survey is finished.

“In this upcoming legislative session, I will work with lawmakers, law enforcement and victims’ advocates to ensure our state crime labs have the resources needed to continue testing unprocessed sexual assault kits,” she said.

The FDLE suggested that the most efficient and inexpensive way to manage the untested kits is through a combination of outsourcing , overtime for lab workers and federal funding.

___

Follow Tamara Lush on Twitter at http://twitter.com/tamaralush.

Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. F*ckers.

  2. Avatar for ljb860 ljb860 says:

    They will find the $$$ to test the kits but after the 1st 500 or so all of a sudden the money will dry up once the same felons appear and reappear and reappear…

  3. Avatar for pshah pshah says:

    The Florida Department of Law Enforcement conducted the $300,000 study on the number of untested kits and will present its findings to the Legislature.

    $300k just to find out how many untested rape kits were out there? That sounds crazy. No computers? No inventory controls? Shouldn’t be that hard.

  4.                    ----- GOP reaction -----
    

    Well… there you have it — Scantily clad women in Florida costing taxpayers big bucks —

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for phlebas Avatar for pshah Avatar for ljb860

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: