DEA Improperly Paid Amtrak Secretary More Than $850k For Passenger Lists

In this Jan. 5, 2010 file photo, northbound Amtrak Acela passes through Middle River, Md. Rep. John Mica, R-Fla., will no longer push to have Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor’s tracks under control of the U.S. Depart... In this Jan. 5, 2010 file photo, northbound Amtrak Acela passes through Middle River, Md. Rep. John Mica, R-Fla., will no longer push to have Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor’s tracks under control of the U.S. Department of Transportation or a new government-created corporation, in order to allow a private company to develop high-speed rail service on the route. (AP Photo/Rob Carr, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Associated Press has learned that the Drug Enforcement Administration paid an Amtrak secretary $854,460 over nearly 20 years to obtain confidential information about train passengers. The DEA could have lawfully obtained for free through a law enforcement network.

The employee was not publicly identified except as a “secretary to a train and engine crew” in a one-paragraph summary of the incident by Amtrak’s inspector general. The secretary was allowed to retire, rather than face administrative discipline, after the discovery that the employee “regularly” sold private passenger information since 1995 without Amtrak’s approval.

On Monday, the office of Amtrak Inspector General Tom Howard declined to identify the secretary or say why it took so long to uncover the payments.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News
2
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Could have obtained for free, except for the fact that they would, I believe, have needed a search warrant. And since they did it this way, costing taxpayers nearly a million dollars, I think the DEA had doubts about getting the warrant.

    This also close to a black-op for which they have no mandate and something that was capped back in the late 1970s with intelligence reform.

    Awfully expensive fishing license I’d say.

    Also, while Amtrak let her go without facing discipline, I think they ought to get as much of that money back from her as possible and apply it to Amtrak operating expenses.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for jeffrey

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: