Clinton Ally Files Ethics Complaint Against Gowdy For Benghazi-Related ‘Leak’

House Select Committee on Benghazi Chairman Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., talks with the news media before walking to a hearing room to hear testimony from Jake Sullivan, former Hillary Clinton aide during her tenure as Secre... House Select Committee on Benghazi Chairman Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., talks with the news media before walking to a hearing room to hear testimony from Jake Sullivan, former Hillary Clinton aide during her tenure as Secretary of State, before a House panel on the Benghazi investigation on Capitol Hill in Washington, Friday, Sept. 4, 2015. A day after questioning a former top aide to presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton behind closed doors, the House committee investigating the deadly Benghazi attacks is taking testimony from another member of Clinton's inner circle in closed session. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

House Benghazi select committee Chair Trey Gowdy (R-SC) inappropriately disclosed private information about a GOP whistleblower who said he was fired from the committee in part because he refused to target Hillary Clinton, according to an ethics complaint from a pro-Clinton watchdog group.

The American Democracy Legal Fund, founded by Clinton ally David Brock, alleged that Gowdy violated the Congressional Accountability Act by disclosing information about ex-staffer Bradley Podliska’s private settlement discussions with the committee. Gowdy told The Washington Post earlier this month that Podliska cited his status as a major in the Air Force reserve as the basis for his termination in a September mediation filing, rather than any pressure to investigate Clinton.

“The CAA prohibits parties to a dispute resolution from disclosing information from the dispute resolute (sic),” ADLF President Brad Woodhouse wrote in a letter dated Oct. 27 to the Office of Congressional Ethics. “Rep. Gowdy violated the statute by publicly revealing the contents of Mr. Podliska’s record and mediation filing in his attempt to discredit the former staffer. For the above stated reasons, we request that OCE commence an immediate investigation into Rep. Gowdy’s conduct.”

The complaint accused Gowdy of disclosing the information in order to defend the Benghazi committee’s work. In recent weeks, both Republicans and Democrats have suggested that the committee was “designed” to go after the Democratic presidential frontrunner.

Brock echoed that charge in a statement provided to TPM.

“Trey Gowdy’s disclosure is yet another example of him selectively sharing private information to influence the media and the public – now even his former Republican staffer, who dared to oppose him, has been made a victim,” Brock said in the statement. “Gowdy’s leak of Podliska’s dispute resolution is a clear violation of well-defined confidentiality provisions, and he must answer for his deliberate and flagrant violation of the law.”

Podliska’s lawyers previously told MSNBC they sent Gowdy a cease-and-desist letter asking the chairman to “stop making statements or releasing information that may violate the confidentiality rules for disputes with former congressional staff.” Podliska has said he intends to file suit for wrongful termination next month.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for jw1 jw1 says:

    Clinton Ally Files Ethics Complaint Against Gowdy…

    Ye reap what ye sow junior.
    Looks like Gowdy Doody has aged 20 years in a month-- no?

    You’ll find that karma is like Crisco Trey: “It All Comes Back Except One Tablespoon™”

    jw1

  2. It just keeps getting worser and worser, eh, Trey??

  3. Like Gowdy cares…
    The only bad kind of publicity for a Tea Bagger is NO Publicity.

  4. Avatar for hallam hallam says:

    The stupid part is that Gowdy’s statement doesn’t even show what he claims.

    Wrongful termination suits have a very limited number of causes of action. Termination for serving in the reserves is one. Termination for not following legal orders to go after Clinton is not. So the suit isn’t going to state an issue that isn’t a cause of action even though it may have been a major part of the reason he was fired.

    If you are going to set up a congressional hearing for an alleged incident of jaywalking you had better make sure that you are completely beyond reproach.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

25 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for ajaykalra Avatar for jw1 Avatar for kwoodgr Avatar for 1audiofile Avatar for coronakid Avatar for leftflank Avatar for humpback Avatar for chammy Avatar for commiedearest Avatar for arrrrrj Avatar for mantan Avatar for sangsue Avatar for neal_anderthal Avatar for twowolves Avatar for hallam Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for azjude Avatar for pshah Avatar for emilianoelmexicano Avatar for bckrd1 Avatar for sherron Avatar for lizzymom

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: