Cornyn, Graham And Hatch Indicate They May Question Blasey Ford In Hearing

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 31:  Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley (R-IA) (R) questions witnesses during a hearing with (L-R) Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) in the Hart Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill July 31, 2018 in Washington, DC. The committee questioned officials from the Boarder Patrol, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Justice about the separation of children from their parents at the U.S.-Mexico border at the government's efforts to reunify those families.  (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 31: Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley (R-IA) (R) questions witnesses during a hearing with (L-R) Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-U... WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 31: Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley (R-IA) (R) questions witnesses during a hearing with (L-R) Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) in the Hart Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill July 31, 2018 in Washington, DC. The committee questioned officials from the Boarder Patrol, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Justice about the separation of children from their parents at the U.S.-Mexico border at the government's efforts to reunify those families. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Three of Brett Kavanaugh’s most fervent Republican supporters on the Senate Judiciary Committee — Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), John Cornyn (R-TX) and Orrin Hatch (R-UT) — have suggested that they may question Christine Blasey Ford during the hearing on Thursday, according to Politico, despite Republicans’ appointment of a female prosecutor to do the questioning for them.

“There’s gaps and there’s inconsistencies, but I expect that will be covered by the staff counsel. If it’s not then I’ll reserve the right to ask questions,” Cornyn told Politico. “Dr. Ford identified three people who were allegedly present who didn’t have any recollection of any such event occurring. That’s one way you provide evidence is provide corroboration.”

While Graham and Hatch didn’t say outright that they planned to question Blasey Ford, neither are “ruling out asking their own questions,” in Politico’s words. Republican committee members asked a female lawyer with a background in prosecuting years-old sex crimes to attend the hearing and question both Blasey Ford and Kavanaugh for them, primarily to avoid appearing insensitive to the accuser as the committee majority is all white men.

Graham — who has been blatant about his distrust of the third woman (and her lawyer) who has accused Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct — told Politico that accusers deserve to be heard, “but when you accuse someone of a crime, the accuser needs to be tested.”

Blasey Ford and Kavanaugh will both testify during a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday about Blasey Ford’s allegations that Kavanugh sexually assaulted her in high school.

Latest News
52
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Someone needs to tell them, “Hey, guys, you can’t have it both ways. You hired a mouthpiece to question this woman. You’ve made your bed, now lie in it.”

    (No, I understand that no one can prevent them from questioning, but they should be called out on it, loudly.)

  2. “Dr. Ford identified three people who were allegedly present who didn’t have any recollection of any such event occurring. That’s one way you provide evidence is provide corroboration.”

    One way you provide evidence, you freaking barnacle, is to do an actual investigation. You refuse to do that.

    ETA: And what an idiotic road to go down. The answer to this is simple, “I have asked repeatedly that the other witnesses be brought in to testify under oath as I am doing. Your committee refused to do so.”

  3. And have those witnesses testify under oath to the FBI

  4. “Barnacle”?!

     

    The answer to this is simple, “I have asked repeatedly that the other
    witnesses be brought in to testify under oath as I am doing. Your
    committee refused to do so.”

    You’re right, of course.

  5. Does that mean these Republicans will be taking back their 5 minutes from Ms. Mitchell that she’ll will be afforded to cover for each of those Senators in the hearing?

    That’s all the Republicans on the committee are granting the Democrats…5 minutes each and only one round, as I understand it.

    If Ms. Mitchell gets to question Ms. Ford and the Republicans also end up doing so, they are essentially giving themselves double the amount of time as the Democrats it seems to me. Seems kinda fishy to me.

    Who’s in charge of the clock and these new fangled rules anyway?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

46 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for ajileye Avatar for imkmu3 Avatar for cervantes Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for pmm080 Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for nomoredevil Avatar for airportman Avatar for sharong Avatar for clauscph Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for tsp Avatar for ljb860 Avatar for johnn Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for read2much Avatar for jakebarnes Avatar for drtv Avatar for moderately Avatar for moniker Avatar for opaquesquid

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: